Good list, but you missed the above. Of course the dress-for-success part I find troubling in the extreme ;).
More seriously, why did she hold back on the program? The article is short on that. She cites other priorities, how much time does it take to say:" "Distribute them matchbooks"?
Don't know.
I'm writing Chamblis, my congresscritter to have them ask specific questions.
See, it wasn't "I'm too busy" - She caused this obstruction with a deliberate order!
Why?
Because distributing matchbooks causes cancer?
What other "orders" has she written?, to who?, and when? that affected internaional US policy?