To: FairOpinion
I share that reasoning. Kevorkian assisted people who were terminally ill and who clearly stated that they wished to end their own lives. Ironically if the U.S. Supreme Court had sided with Kevorkian, we might not be having this debate now over Terri Schiavo.
48 posted on
03/27/2005 7:41:07 PM PST by
Enterprise
(Abortion and "euthanasia" - the twin destroyers of the Democrat Party.)
To: Enterprise
There is a story that Kevorkian finished off a woman who changed her mind at the last minute.
To: Enterprise
"Ironically if the U.S. Supreme Court had sided with Kevorkian, we might not be having this debate now over Terri Schiavo."
Yes we would. There is a PROFOUND difference between providing the means and allowing people to decide for themselves that they want to die (as Kevorkian did), versus KILLING people, who are unable to defend themselves ( as Greer did)
To: Enterprise
Kevorkian assisted people who were terminally ill and who clearly stated that they wished to end their own lives. Actually Kovorkin killed several people who were not terminally ill and at least one that was not ill at all.
58 posted on
03/27/2005 7:55:59 PM PST by
Harmless Teddy Bear
( We're all doomed! Who's flying this thing!? Oh right, that would be me. Back to work.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson