Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
I share that reasoning. Kevorkian assisted people who were terminally ill and who clearly stated that they wished to end their own lives. Ironically if the U.S. Supreme Court had sided with Kevorkian, we might not be having this debate now over Terri Schiavo.
48 posted on 03/27/2005 7:41:07 PM PST by Enterprise (Abortion and "euthanasia" - the twin destroyers of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise

There is a story that Kevorkian finished off a woman who changed her mind at the last minute.


49 posted on 03/27/2005 7:42:07 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

"Ironically if the U.S. Supreme Court had sided with Kevorkian, we might not be having this debate now over Terri Schiavo."


Yes we would. There is a PROFOUND difference between providing the means and allowing people to decide for themselves that they want to die (as Kevorkian did), versus KILLING people, who are unable to defend themselves ( as Greer did)


50 posted on 03/27/2005 7:45:05 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise
Kevorkian assisted people who were terminally ill and who clearly stated that they wished to end their own lives.

Actually Kovorkin killed several people who were not terminally ill and at least one that was not ill at all.

58 posted on 03/27/2005 7:55:59 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear ( We're all doomed! Who's flying this thing!? Oh right, that would be me. Back to work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson