Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thumper1960

Actually Kevorkian would never kill a defenseless person, with no evidence what that person wanted. He didn't kill them. He merely provided the means, for those who really DID want to end their life, to make it easier. And he is in jail.

What Greer did is MURDER: ordered the murder of a defenseless woman, whose wishes were NOT established beyond a reasonable doubt, a person, who was not suffering, was not in pain, had a loving family, who wanted to take care of her. Kevorkian is a saint, in comparison.


40 posted on 03/27/2005 7:28:17 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
I share that reasoning. Kevorkian assisted people who were terminally ill and who clearly stated that they wished to end their own lives. Ironically if the U.S. Supreme Court had sided with Kevorkian, we might not be having this debate now over Terri Schiavo.
48 posted on 03/27/2005 7:41:07 PM PST by Enterprise (Abortion and "euthanasia" - the twin destroyers of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

Perhaps, the Dr. Singer would be a better example?


55 posted on 03/27/2005 7:51:49 PM PST by Thumper1960 ("It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed."-V.I.Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson