What, exactly, are the Bush brothers supposed to do that they have not already done? But I guess this is not the time for rational arguments.
Thankfully, I see a few more of them today than I have in the past four or five days at this forum.
It's still out of control, but a see more sanity today, and that's encouraging.
Here's a "rational argument" for you:
The president of the United States should have sent a large contingent of U.S. Marshals to take custody of Terri the MINUTE the congress supoenaed her to appear before them.
It is a felony to interfere with a supoenaed witness in a federal case. Killing one is presumably not acceptable.I have seen the law, and apologize for not remembering its numbers. It has been posted previously.
Attempting to kill a woman congress demanded to see before them is a federal crime, King Greer, the SCOF, and needless appeals aside.
The TRUTH could have been presented to the American people on T.V. in living color, and our sides' prerogatives would be very different. And I am not a Christian zealot, or even a believer in God. But the "nutcases" in the religious right have an absolute ally in me. This is the most horrible story since Beslan.
I heard on the Dennis Prager show thurs. The caller(?) said (I paraphrase) We can no longer condemn human rights abuses in other countries because George or Jeb Bush won't save Terri.
the nutcases are coming out in droves.
Or just people wanting to blame them anyway no matter what. That's all they do is blame the President or his brother. Too bad they can't think beyond their noses, they might learn something from George and Jeb.