Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SALChamps03
Also, we do not know what kind of relationship the accusing officer had with his fellow police officer. Maybe he saw it as an opportunity to get rid of her for some past wrong. Maybe not. We do not know.

Right there you just called the police officers who gave witness and the one who wrote the report liars.

You doubt their word but do not doubt the word of a out of control jailer. Interesting.

160 posted on 03/29/2005 8:44:42 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear ( We're all doomed! Who's flying this thing!? Oh right, that would be me. Back to work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear

No, I did not. How do you equate "We don't know" with "They are liars?" We don't know means we don't know. We weren't there to see who was out of control and who wasn't out of control. Without actually witnessing the event, we can only speculate. That's what you are doing, and that's what I am doing. However, I do know this. Drug addicts lie and lie often. This whole thing could have been blown out of proportion. Apparently the administration felt justified in firing the jailer. That's fine. They have facts that we don't have. No, I don't think this person deserves any money. It's not her I don't approve of. It's her actions. Now some lawyer is going to take money from tax payers, keep most of it for himself, and then we can watch the druggie snort the rest of it up her nose. Hard working people pay taxes. No I don't want this piece of trash to get a cent. The firing of the jailer is enough.


168 posted on 03/29/2005 11:54:12 AM PST by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson