" right and wrong are only reflected by the laws, not determined by them "
You mean we shouldn't just bow down to the law no matter what it says? We should actually have independent thinking and be able to discern between right and wrong on our own?
Mark Steyn certainly has a way to put things in a clear light. Also from the article,
"There seems to be a genuine dispute about her condition -- between those on her husband's side, who say she has ''no consciousness,'' and those on her parents' side, who say she is capable of basic, childlike reactions. If the latter are correct, ending her life is an act of murder. If the former are correct, what difference does it make? If she feels nothing -- if there's no there there -- she has no misery to be put out of. That being so, why not err in favor of the non-irreversible option?"