Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FORCED TO THINK
Human Events - Weekly Wrap Up ^ | Friday, March 25, 2005 | Chris Field

Posted on 03/25/2005 3:19:03 PM PST by CyberAnt

Forced to Think

Obviously, the biggest story over the last week has been the court-ordered death of Terri Schiavo. This whole saga forced an entire country to step back and think, and prompted a bunch of questions and musings for yours truly. Including:

*** During the bitter floor fight in the House of Representatives last Sunday, über-liberal Rep. Barney Frank said this about Congress' efforts to help Terri Schiavo:

"This is a terribly difficult decision, which we are institutionally totally incompetent to make."

Interesting. Since when did Congress' incompetence on an issue prevent it from acting? If they would follow a rule limiting their actions to subjects on which they were competent, the U.S. would have the small government Republicans purport to want.

*** There's an old question that asks:

"If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it actually make a sound?"

Along those lines, I would posit this question:

"If you're starving to death and unable to scream or cry, are you actually in pain?"

*** Shouldn't Judge Greer be brought up on Contempt of Congress charges? He refused to keep alive a witness subpoenaed by Congress. If he's not in contempt, what good is a Congressional subpoena?

*** If Terri cannot swallow liquids, how is it she did not choke on her own saliva?

*** If Terri can swallow, why was she denied water after her feeding tube was removed?

*** What is the difference between abandoning Terri in her bed without food and water being put into her system and abandoning a newborn baby in a coat closet without food and water being put into his system?

*** Republicans are being accused of hypocrisy to the nth degree for "trampling all over" the principle of "federalism" -- as the Democrats like to define it -- with the passage of the Terri Schiavo Bill last weekend.

Apparently, the Left considers forced starvation-dehydration to be a states' rights issue. (Democrats haven't claimed to be this supportive of states' rights since the Federal Marriage Amendment.)

What the Democrats refuse to acknowledge is that the GOP is acting completely within the bounds of the Constitution:

Article III, Section 2 allows Congress to determine the jurisdiction of the courts; the Fifth Amendment says no one may "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"; and the Fourteenth Amendment says no state may "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."

*** If we're going to discuss who follows the Constitution, how many of the Left's pet issues are actually backed up by the Constitution? Gun control? Separation of church and state? Abortion? Homosexual sodomy? Campaign finance reform? Right to privacy?

*** Why should we believe that Terri did in fact express a desire to be killed in a situation like the one in which she found herself?

*** Has Michael Schiavo shown himself to be a man of unimpeachable character? Has anyone asked his live-in girlfriend and two illegitimate children what they think of him as a role-model?

*** If Terri did want to die, where, exactly, is that "right to die" enumerated in the Constitution? I don't believe that a right to life presupposes a right to death.

*** There is obviously some doubt about who's telling the truth in this case. Either Terri said she wants to die or she didn't. Either Michael is a liar or he isn't.

Since when, in a "He-Said-She-Said" case, has the Left been on the side of the man?

*** Where do we go from here?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; righttolive; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo
Perhaps Michael's lawyer being a member of the Board of Directors would be considered an answer to the next to last question.
1 posted on 03/25/2005 3:19:03 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Bokkmarked


2 posted on 03/25/2005 3:24:17 PM PST by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
There is obviously some doubt about who's telling the truth in this case.

There is only doubt. But, all this has been brought forth in the past week's discussion. Many are in the Perry Mason mode and many will still be in the Perry Mason mode fifty years from now. There won't be much new in the case, but the ramifications may extend to the depths of society.

3 posted on 03/25/2005 3:25:07 PM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

bttt


4 posted on 04/01/2005 4:44:58 AM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

bttt


5 posted on 04/01/2005 4:47:38 AM PST by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson