Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Mojo; gitmo
"If an earlier version of Deep Blue beat Garry Kasparov - the greatest chess player who ever lived, in the opinion of many - in his prime I suspect it would make short work of a 62 year old Fischer."

"I've always wondered if his tactics of not showing up for matches against the Russian masters was just some delusional zone-out or something."

I still wonder if Deep Blue or its programmers could ever account for the unpredictability of Fischer's apparent insanity. Granted there are a finite number of possible moves on a chess board, but Deep Blue's computational capabilites, immense as they are, have to have some ultimate outer limit. Could the biochemical dysfunction of Fischer's "wiring" possibly result in a capability that is just sufficiently enough greater than Deep Blue to allow him to win?

34 posted on 03/25/2005 3:13:55 PM PST by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Joe 6-pack

I'm guessing Deep Blue doesn't attempt to assign probabilities to an opponent's moves. So a wacko response would be no less expected than a logical one.


45 posted on 03/25/2005 4:09:44 PM PST by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson