Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
AP ^ | 3/25/05 | EMILY FREDRIX

Posted on 03/25/2005 1:49:29 PM PST by Jenya

Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News

It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox News. The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news at all. Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.

The Tulsa, Okla., resident also has received thousands of e-mails, both angry and complimentary - as well as a few death threats.

"Apparently the making of terroristic threats against those who don't share your views is a high art form among a certain core audience," said Kimery, 45.

Formerly a registered Republican, even a precinct captain, Kimery became an independent in the 1990s when he said the state party stopped taking input from its everyday members.

Kimery now contends Fox News' top-level management dictates a conservative journalistic bias, that inaccuracies are never retracted, and what winds up on the air is more opinion than news. "I might as well be reading tabloids out of the grocery store," he says. "Anything to get a rise out of the viewer and to reinforce certain retrograde notions."

A Fox spokeswoman at the station's New York headquarters said the channel's ratings speak for themselves. For the first three months of this year, Fox has been averaging 1.62 million viewers in prime-time, compared with CNN's 805,000, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Kimery's motives go deeper than preventing people from watching the channel, which he acknowledges can be done without the Blocker. But he likens his device to burning a draft card, a tangible example of disagreement.

And he's taking this message to the network's advertisers. After buying the $8.95 device online, would-be blockers are shown a letter that they can send to advertisers via the Fox Blocker site.

"The point is not to block the channel or block free speech but to raise awareness," said Kimery, who works in the tech industry.

Kimery doesn't use the device himself; his remote is programmed to only a half-dozen channels. Plus he occasionally feels the need to tune into Fox News for something "especially heinous."

Business could pick up since the blocker was alluded to in a recent episode of the ABC drama "Boston Legal." The show's original script mentioned Fox News, but ABC had the references removed.

The boisterous conversations on Fox News may be why the station is so popular, said Matthew Felling, media director for the Center for Media and Public Affairs, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media watchdog group. And despite a perception that Fox leans to the right, Felling said, that doesn't mean people who lean left should tune out.

"It's tough to engage in an argument when you're not participating in it," Felling said. "It's just one more layer in the wall that the right and the left are building in between each other."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foxnews; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2005 1:49:29 PM PST by Jenya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jenya


I have one too.
It's called a remote control device.


2 posted on 03/25/2005 1:50:19 PM PST by onyx (Robert Frost "Good fences make good neighbors." Build the fence, Mr. President and Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

I just wish I had thought of it. I could have scammed a mint from the DUmmies.


3 posted on 03/25/2005 1:51:00 PM PST by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya; All

I suspect this is intended to be placed in hotel rooms, etc...


4 posted on 03/25/2005 1:51:46 PM PST by 1stFreedom (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

""Formerly a registered Republican, even a precinct captain, Kimery became an independent in the 1990s when he said the state party stopped taking input from its everyday members.""


HAHAHA! That's when the Republican party got good! Really good!


5 posted on 03/25/2005 1:52:24 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

I feel a chill wind blowing...


6 posted on 03/25/2005 1:52:57 PM PST by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

I want a device that transfers bricks to liberals on TV.


7 posted on 03/25/2005 1:54:08 PM PST by bmwcyle (Washington DC RINO Hunting Guide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya
Formerly a registered Republican, even a precinct captain,

Doesn't Rush Limbaugh call these guys seminar callers?

8 posted on 03/25/2005 1:54:39 PM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya
...that inaccuracies are never retracted...

Yeah, those damned innaccuracies are worse than ABCNNBCBS' outright lies!

9 posted on 03/25/2005 1:54:43 PM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya
...Kimery became an independent in the 1990s when he said the state party stopped taking input from its everyday members.

No, I suspect that's when the party stopped talking to your lame ass, Kimery.

10 posted on 03/25/2005 1:54:52 PM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

I wonder how he feels about Rathergate. Not really. I don't wonder.


11 posted on 03/25/2005 1:57:16 PM PST by Jenya (Feed Terri Shiavo. Starve her husband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

12 posted on 03/25/2005 1:57:20 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I could have scammed a mint from the DUmmies.

Don't you have to wait for them to save up more lunch money after the election "fraud" debacle?

13 posted on 03/25/2005 1:58:03 PM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

I wonder if he could make one to block religious programming.


14 posted on 03/25/2005 1:58:14 PM PST by bukkdems ("My aunt was very frugal" - Benon Savon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

If they can afford an "undies for Andy" telethon, they can afford to by the essential FOX blocker.


15 posted on 03/25/2005 2:00:00 PM PST by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jenya
I am still totally baffled.
Anyone who doesn't want to watch Fox News can block it out from any TV made in the last 15 years. No device is necessary. Anyone, with two brain cells to rub together, can do it. Seven-year-olds can do it.

As far as I know, no one is allowed to mess with other people's TVs. So where's the "need"?

Or are we talking about a "pet rock" sort of thing here?

16 posted on 03/25/2005 2:00:12 PM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
"I have one too. It's called a remote control device."

Exactly. Well, to everyone who purchases one of these devices, I say, "There's one born every minute."

17 posted on 03/25/2005 2:00:52 PM PST by redhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jenya
Heh heh... $8.95 for something to block a channel on a television. Next up, $14.95 for a device to stop your radio from receiving ClearChannel stations, $29.95 for a device that prevents certain books you have from opening, and $99.95 for a device that will only allow a magazine to fall open to certain pages.

And leftists have to wonder why they can't win elections? I'm surprised they can even tie their shoes (or buckle their Birkenstocks) without a note from the government. Always get someone else to do it for you -- the leftist credo.

18 posted on 03/25/2005 2:01:27 PM PST by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
I want a device that transfers bricks to liberals on TV.

Wouldn't the reverse be a lot more useful?

19 posted on 03/25/2005 2:01:41 PM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
As far as I know, no one is allowed to mess with other people's TVs. So where's the "need"?

Symbolic liberal crap.

20 posted on 03/25/2005 2:02:30 PM PST by Jenya (Feed Terri Shiavo. Starve her husband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson