Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stoat

Indian reservations like Red Lake are sovereign states. So why would President Bush say anything about it?


4 posted on 03/25/2005 9:15:27 AM PST by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: miliantnutcase

They're not really sovereign states in the sense of being foreign. They're sovereign in the sense of being under their own laws and councils, as opposed to those of the state in which they sit.


19 posted on 03/25/2005 10:13:45 AM PST by Vicomte13 (Aure entuluva.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: miliantnutcase
Indian reservations like Red Lake are sovereign states.

If they're sovereign states, how come the people living there get to vote? If they people living there are citizens, how come they don't have to obey the same laws the rest of us do?

30 posted on 03/25/2005 12:47:11 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (My book is out. Read excerpts at http://www.thejusticecooperative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: miliantnutcase
Indian reservations like Red Lake are sovereign states.

In the same sense that Texas or Florida are sovereign states. Which is to say, not very.

31 posted on 03/25/2005 2:45:21 PM PST by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson