huh?
1 posted on
03/25/2005 8:50:05 AM PST by
bedolido
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: bedolido
I'm sending this article to SirSuziQ. He's a big math guy!
38 posted on
03/25/2005 9:09:26 AM PST by
SuziQ
To: bedolido
Very nice. Congratulations to Mahlburg.
To: All
"For example, the number of partitions for any number ending in 4 or 9 is divisible by 5."Since we happen to use a base 10 system (for no other reason than we learn to count on 10 fingers), do problems like this really matter? Is there an equivalent observation to be had in binary, trinary, or any other base? If not, then why should we care about such silly patterns?
To: bedolido
I read the article but I still don't understand CBS's new show, Numbers.
53 posted on
03/25/2005 9:17:13 AM PST by
ops33
(Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
To: bedolido
I could have told him long ago that the answer is 42.
65 posted on
03/25/2005 9:25:11 AM PST by
DC Bound
To: bedolido
This is obviously a hoax. Al Gore figured this out on a cocktail napkin years ago.
To: bedolido
117 posted on
03/25/2005 10:13:29 AM PST by
jpsb
To: Darth Reagan
126 posted on
03/25/2005 10:31:38 AM PST by
marblehead17
(I love it when a plan comes together.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson