It fails us everyday.
Recovered Vegetative State Patient Kate Adamson Speaks Before Schiavo Rally
One of the most painful experiences you can imagine." Unable to respond or to indicate awareness, Kate Adamson asserts, I was just like Terri but I was alive! I could hear every word. They were saying shall we just not treat her?...I suffered excruciating misery in silence.
Struck down in 1995 at the age of thirty-three by a rare double brainstem stroke, Kate, then a mother of two young girls, was completely paralyzed; she was unable even to blink her eyes. Like Terri Schiavo, the medical staff treating her questioned the merit of continuing granting Kate the most basic human right of food and water. "I suffered excruciating misery in silence.
Kate Adamsons feeding tube was at one point removed for a full eight days before being reinserted due to the intervention of her husband (also a competent lawyer).
Picture of Kate Adamson: totally paralyzed by a severe double brainstem stroke on June 29, 1995.
This is Kate today (thanks to a loving husband who did not give up on her)
.
bump
Great post.
1-850-487-1111
Be nice and thank him for what he has done so far. I believe that some of what was said about the Florida Republican senators before they had even voted (by RT) may have forced them into the wrong vote.
But the lonely husband eventually began seeing other women.
The lonely husband was already seeing other women. At the time he testified in the malpractice suit, he had been involved with a woman named Cindy Shook for almost a year.
That really sums it up.
Thanks so much for posting the article.....Spunky
Questions that need to be immediately considered:
(1) Why did Michael choose to 'ignore' her wishes for nearly 7 years until 1997 when he announced he was'engaged' to Jodi Centonze and 'suddenly' remembered the conversation about life support with Terri from years before?
Respondent answer would most likely rationalize that it took that long before Michael Schiavo realized there was 'no hope for recovery...'
(2) However, the 1992 malpractice suit for $20 million was based on the premise/conclusion that Terri would NOT recover and she would require constant medical care for the remainder of her life estimated by Michael Shiavo and his laywers to be 51 years(which is the normal life expectancey)...Where were her WISHES at that time?
(3) The court, in 1997 when Michael announced he was 'engaged' should have immediately conducted a guardianship hearing and transfered Terri to State guardianship, at a minimum because of the obvious conflict of interest on the part of Michael Shiavo.
The court system failed to act at that point, and that is a major factor on why we are at the point we are today.
(4) Guardianship, by law and practice, is determined to be given to that person who is most heavily 'biased' in favor of the disabled person. Under most conditions this would be the spouse. However, most prudent courts, if during the guardianship period, the appointed guardian by circumstances or accident tilts the 'bias' away from the interest of the person so guarded, would conduct an immediate review, and at a minimum, transfer guardianship to the appropriate State agency.
An additional thought, as I presented it to my class at the university yesterday and I posed the question to the students:
If Terri Schiavo's medical condition, feeding tube et al, was exactly the same as it is, age 25, etc. with the single exception that she was not 'mentally' disabled but had all other functions; and she expressed a desire to have the feeding tube removed and wanted to die, what would we do?
Of course the answer is clear, she would not be allowed to make that 'choice' and would be sent for counselling, etc.
Van & Katherine Jenerette - www.jenerette.com
Thanks, Joe. You've posted some good reads today (and a special thanks for keeping us up to date on the hate-filled rhetoric coming from the socialists).
Good article. Thanks.
I am reminded of words of wisdom from an ancient text.
From various translations, it is the following:
"There is a way which seems right to a man, but in the end it leads to death." WEB
"There is a way which seemeth right unto a man; But the end thereof are the ways of death." ASV
"There is a way which seems straight before a man, but its end is the ways of death." BBE
"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof is the ways of death." DBY
"There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." KJV
"There is a way which seemeth right to a man, but the end of it are the ways of death." WBS
"There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." JPS
"There is a way -- right before a man, And its latter end 'are' ways of death." YLT
(Proverbs 14:12)
Thanks for posting this. This one needs a BTTT.