Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
Sure he could. Break the law and do it.

A human law that violates natural law is void. A Catholic is not only not obliged to follow such an immoral law, but they are OBLIGED to disobey it.

He could also be impeached over it.

If you believe that, you're nuts.

The pro-lifers already risk losing ground over this issue. We really don't need a lawless governor further damaging the credibility of those who stand for life.

Free advice given by an enemy is worth what you pay for it. Weren't you the guy who had grave doubts about Humanae Vitae? For you, the time to stand up and defend innocent life is apparently never.
89 posted on 03/25/2005 2:18:42 PM PST by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Antoninus
For you, the time to stand up and defend innocent life is apparently never.

I heard a lot out of you over TS six months ago (NOT!) when the Florida legislature could have changed the law regarding what is, and what is not, a medical procedure ("sustenance and hydration" are "medical procedures" in Florida law).

Now, at the eleventh hour, you and many others want to just ignore laws you don't agree with.

93 posted on 03/25/2005 2:35:16 PM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson