Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

QDR Could Lead To Extended Production Line For F/A-22
Defense Daily | March 25, 2005 | Sharon Weinberger

Posted on 03/25/2005 7:47:04 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen

As the Pentagon works on a four-year review of its force size and military strategy, the Air Force is hoping that the final analysis will either restore cuts to its premiere fighter program, or least delay closing the production line, according to a key service official involved in the effort.

Maj. Gen. Ronald Bath, the director of Air Force strategic planning, says service officials intend to make the case for the F/A-22. ''I think that the number will go up, the production line will stay open, or a combination of both,'' he said in an interview Wednesday with Defense Daily.

Since seeing projected production of the Lockheed Martin [LMT] F/A-22 Raptor slashed to just 179 aircraft following an internal Pentagon budget drill, the Air Force has been making the case to boost the number of aircraft. The current Air Force requirement is for 381 F/A-22s.

Along with cutting the number of aircraft, that budget drill, which resulted in the now infamous Program Budget Decision 753, would have the Raptor production line close at the end of 2008.

''I do think the industrial base is something that needs to be thought about,'' Bath said. He argued that keeping the F/A-22 production line open would help hedge against any possible delay to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, also produced by Lockheed.

The ongoing Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) is expected to help resolve what that final number of F/A-22s should be. Work on the QDR is just getting started, however, with the establishment of 'integrated product teams' in areas ranging from air dominance to business practices.

''The process is taking shape as we speak,'' said Bath, who is leading the Air Force’s QDR work.

For example, not all of the integrated product teams have even met yet, according to Bath, who described them as in the 'discovery phase' of their work. '' think within a month, the IPTs will be up and running and getting into their analysis.''

There are expected to be a number of differences between the current QDR, and the last one, completed in 2001. Senior Pentagon officials have repeatedly emphasized that this time around, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is directing the QDR as a 'top-down' review.

On the other hand, the Pentagon's leadership did change course slightly earlier this year, deciding to bring in more service representation. The IPTs all now have uniformed officers representing the services.

Another change for the current QDR is the notion of incorporating 'rolling decisions' from the ongoing analysis. ''I think some of the first decisions will come down in the early summer,'' Bath said, adding that the final analysis should come together in the fall.

The full QDR is due to Congress in February 2006.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: fa22; lockheedmartin; miltech; usaf

1 posted on 03/25/2005 7:47:04 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
If we like air dominance...makes the choice easy.
2 posted on 03/25/2005 7:49:50 AM PST by demlosers (Soylent Green is made in Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen

Y'know, I work for LockMart's competition, and even *I* don't want the F/A-22 program canceled. What the heck are they thinking up there?


3 posted on 03/25/2005 7:55:04 AM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen

The cutbacks are the inevitable result of the pressure enititlement programs are putting on the government. Its only going to get worse.


4 posted on 03/25/2005 8:03:20 AM PST by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
The Air force wants more F-22's.
The Japanese have made some noise to that effect.
Personally, I would like to do both and to develop a true light stealth bomber based on the F-22.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/fb-22.htm
5 posted on 03/26/2005 1:40:45 AM PST by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

You follow these Raptor threads?

Ping


6 posted on 03/28/2005 1:32:15 PM PST by nicollo (All economics are politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicollo; Stand Watch Listen; COEXERJ145; microgood; starfish923; liberallarry; cmsgop; ...
Ping!

If you want on or off my ping list, please contact me by Freep mail not by posting to this thread.

7 posted on 03/28/2005 1:36:40 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rmlew; Stand Watch Listen; nicollo
The Air force wants more F-22's.
The Japanese have made some noise to that effect.
Personally, I would like to do both and to develop a true light stealth bomber based on the F-22.

Plus most of the cost has already been incurred. I wish they would talk about the "fly away" costs rather than the average cost. Decreasing the number of units produced necessarily increases average costs.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/fb-22.htm

Here's a picture of the proposed FB-22. Notice it's tailless.


8 posted on 03/28/2005 1:44:37 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative; Gucho



9 posted on 03/28/2005 1:44:42 PM PST by anonymoussierra ("Et iube me venire ad te, ut cum Sanctis tuis laudem te in saecula saeculorum. Amen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

From four tails to no tails....doesn't seem right!


10 posted on 03/28/2005 1:50:32 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
That's just for the bomber version. It improves the stealthiness of the aircraft. With the small diameter bombs, it could be the successor to the F-15E.
11 posted on 03/28/2005 1:54:28 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen

BTTT


12 posted on 03/28/2005 1:58:47 PM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen

Way Cool !!


13 posted on 03/28/2005 2:29:19 PM PST by Fast1 (Destroy America buy Chinese goods,Shop at Wal-Mart 3/18/05 American was gone when I woke up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
"Here's a picture of the proposed FB-22. Notice it's tailless."

Ok.

How is it then stabilized and steered?

Looks MIGHTY unstable.
14 posted on 03/28/2005 2:31:09 PM PST by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

How is the B-2 stabilized?


15 posted on 03/28/2005 2:55:09 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Good point.

Via FM

FM=Freakin' Magic.......


16 posted on 03/28/2005 3:16:27 PM PST by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

That FB-22 looks like it could hold 6 racks of those SDB's!


17 posted on 03/29/2005 12:41:57 AM PST by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson