Posted on 03/25/2005 5:21:18 AM PST by mhking
She's not being 'let go'. She's being SENT!
Jesus takes people every day who have full stomachs. Food has never stopped anyone from dying, unless there's nothing else to cause death except intentional starvation.
Good point!
Amen!
I know that...I was assuming you knew I meant WITHOUT repenting.
You want to bring the Bible into it? Very well. Meet Hazael.
7 Elisha went to Damascus, and Ben-Hadad king of Aram was ill. When the king was told, "The man of God has come all the way up here,"
8 he said to Hazael, "Take a gift with you and go to meet the man of God. Consult the LORD through him; ask him, 'Will I recover from this illness?' "
9 Hazael went to meet Elisha, taking with him as a gift forty camel-loads of all the finest wares of Damascus. He went in and stood before him, and said, "Your son Ben-Hadad king of Aram has sent me to ask, 'Will I recover from this illness?' "
10 Elisha answered, "Go and say to him, 'You will certainly recover'; but [a] the LORD has revealed to me that he will in fact die."
11 He stared at him with a fixed gaze until Hazael felt ashamed. Then the man of God began to weep.
12 "Why is my lord weeping?" asked Hazael. "Because I know the harm you will do to the Israelites," he answered. "You will set fire to their fortified places, kill their young men with the sword, dash their little children to the ground, and rip open their pregnant women."
13 Hazael said, "How could your servant, a mere dog, accomplish such a feat?"
"The LORD has shown me that you will become king of Aram," answered Elisha.
14 Then Hazael left Elisha and returned to his master. When Ben-Hadad asked, "What did Elisha say to you?" Hazael replied, "He told me that you would certainly recover."
15 But the next day he took a thick cloth, soaked it in water and spread it over the king's face, so that he died. Then Hazael succeeded him as king.
I guess he was just "sending Ben-Hadad to be with the Lord".
Hey at least he didn't torture him for a week
This is a joke, right?! Since when has Neal Boortz, that pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, obvious-disdain-for-religion libertinarian ever given a rat's rear end about Heaven? I'm not surprised that he's part of the "Let-Terri-go" contingent and for him to even utter such ramblings is a laugh!
Of course Jesus is waiting for her with open arms... but doesn't that death negate His wish for testimony and evidence of our harm and adultery against God?
The antechrist has spoken indeed in these articles.
Her death is due to our sins, let us remember that, for so was His!!!
If you would have asked me 2-3 days ago I would have said "SAVE HER", but after 7 (almost 8) days, I say let her go Home.
Thanks to, you we can read the transcript, see the context and know what he REALLY said.
You're doing a great service for freepers.....and I know it's a helluva lot of work.
Leni
The shiavo tree has borne fruit that is stinking, doubtful , and dangerous looking. The shiavo tree has NOT brought forth GOOD FRUIT.
Yeah...he sounded like a liberal twit.
Thanks for your reply. I'm not sure, but think so. I would want it. Since I posted the original question, I've heard that she hasn't been allowed communion because it would be considered "nourishment". God bless her.
This becomes clearer as each day passes. Terri's parched lips have revealed many dry and brittle hearts.
"Jesus answered and said unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life." -- John 4:13-14.
Amen!
So those who have pushed to liberate Terri from this body of suffering to be in a better place should be punished?
I think you have it backwards.
How absurd. We're talking about somebody in vegatative state for more than 15 years. Get real.
This makes me heartsick, Dr.E.
If Lincoln could tell the Supreme Court to take a hike, and order the Emancipation Proclamation over the Dred Scot ruling, then an executive has room to act here.
It just takes a good reason.
The refusal to allow natural feeding and hydration is that good reason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.