To: Bear_Slayer
Having witnessed the end of Timothy McVeigh, I would have to disagree with calling his actions "in principle, i.e standing up to government." He planned and committed cold-hearted murder, period.
With all due respects, if you are only willing to join a fight someone else has started, and not stand up for what you see as wrong on your own or start the fight because you see the injustice, then you truly lack the courage of your convictions.
102 posted on
03/25/2005 5:57:34 AM PST by
Military family member
(If pro is the opposite of con and con the opposite of pro, then the opposite of Progress is Congress)
To: Military family member
Having witnessed the end of Timothy McVeigh, I would have to disagree with calling his actions "in principle, i.e standing up to government." He planned and committed cold-hearted murder, period.
You confuse the two. In principle, what he did was stand up to big government. In practice, he murdered 187 people.
With all due respects, if you are only willing to join a fight someone else has started, and not stand up for what you see as wrong on your own or start the fight because you see the injustice, then you truly lack the courage of your convictions
It is not that I lack the courage of my convictions; I make an observation about many. The cost, even as little as it is, is too high, at the present. That is why many, wait to pick their battles.
Am I a coward? Maybe - but I'm waiting for the 2nd shot heard round the world and then, if it is a good fight - I'll get in.
110 posted on
03/25/2005 6:07:33 AM PST by
Bear_Slayer
(If you're gonna be a Knight act like a Knight.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson