It's perfectly relevant. You just wish it weren't.
I said: "If she is able to feed herself, and wants to..."
One of your conditions for being deserving of life is that a person be able to feed themselves?
Not at all...contrary to you, I respect all lives--and rights. I respect Mrs. Schiavo's right to life, and the right to surrender that life. I respect the rule of law and our system of government rather than vigilanteism.
My point about being able to feed herself goes back to the original question/implied claim. If Mrs. Schiavo were able to feed herself--which was from the original point--then Judge Greer's order would NOT mean that they'd prevent food from being provided for her to eat...if she wanted to eat it herself. But if she did not want to eat, it can't be forced.