I appreciate your point but there's something about Greer that goes down to bedrock somehow. He is fighting like a little banty rooster. His rulings are so transparently prejudiced, he knows and you know he's taking fairly desperate career chances. Yet he keeps getting more frenetic and bizarre. This does not compute for me that he's doing it to protect some cushy deal with the hospices. I sense something bigger and a lot meaner. He seems to have his heart in it too, in some odd way, otherwise I'd suspect blackmail.
A mystery -- and a very interesting one!
Armor says in this column that Greer took money from Michael Schiavo's lawyers! But I guess that's legal since the appellate courts found no conflict of interest on Greer's part? Or did they not look at that possibility???????
"This does not compute for me that he's doing it to protect some cushy deal with the hospices. I sense something bigger and a lot meaner. He seems to have his heart in it too"
Please read my post again, out loud. Sadly, I think it covers the "bigger and a lot meaner" criteria, terribly well.
I can't say a glib "love your tagline" but can say with the blackest possible 'humor noir' that it is DEAD ON. FReegards.
(Liberals had better stop preaching about quality of life and start worrying about quality of death)