Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T'wit
I appreciate your point but there's something about Greer that goes down to bedrock somehow. He is fighting like a little banty rooster. His rulings are so transparently prejudiced, he knows and you know he's taking fairly desperate career chances. Yet he keeps getting more frenetic and bizarre. This does not compute for me that he's doing it to protect some cushy deal with the hospices. I sense something bigger and a lot meaner. He seems to have his heart in it too, in some odd way, otherwise I'd suspect blackmail.

Armor says in this column that Greer took money from Michael Schiavo's lawyers! But I guess that's legal since the appellate courts found no conflict of interest on Greer's part? Or did they not look at that possibility???????

96 posted on 03/25/2005 6:50:35 AM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: eeriegeno
Since when are lawyers going to agree that it's "illegal" to give each other bribes contributions?

My instinct remains that this is something more than a few dollars -- or even a lot of dollars. Something much more sinister.

97 posted on 03/25/2005 7:01:29 AM PST by T'wit (Liberals had better stop preaching about quality of life and start worrying about quality of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson