To: Luis Gonzalez
Not sophistry...law.Horse excrement. Obviously Michael's status as guardian is in question because it is still being argued. This is not the work of pro-life politicians as you suggest - it is her family who argue this. In the presence of this haze, she should be allowed to live. You are content to let Judge Greer short circuit this, and let her die.
Ivan
983 posted on
03/24/2005 11:30:03 AM PST by
MadIvan
(One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
To: MadIvan
How many Judges have reviewed the case?
Close to 20 I believe.
988 posted on
03/24/2005 11:35:07 AM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
To: MadIvan
Obviously Michael's status as guardian is in question because it is still being argued. This is not the work of pro-life politicians as you suggest - it is her family who argue this. Er, no.
If I say that I am the rightful King of England, that does not mean that the line of succession is being "argued" in any meaningful sense, unless and until I present some credible reason to have the existing legal determinations in the matter set aside. That has no more been accomplished in this case than it has in my hypothetical example.
1,000 posted on
03/24/2005 11:50:17 AM PST by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson