Posted on 03/24/2005 5:04:46 AM PST by beaureguard
I signed off my talk show yesterday, stuffed unused newspaper articles in my briefcase, and headed home. As I pulled out of the studio parking garage I did what I usually do I tuned in to see what Rush was talking about. On this particular day I had no doubt as to what the subject would be, but I wanted to hear his latest thoughts.
My studio getaway was so efficient, so swift that I was on the road in time to hear Rush come out of his hourly newsbreak. Now before I go any further, let it be clear; Im a Rush Limbaughs fan. Nobody does talk radio better, not even me. I love what hes done for our radio format, what hes done for America, and what hes done to the left. Liberals hate him. I love him for that too. Rush has made me money by elevating the talk radio format to the top of the heap, and saved me even more through the tax cuts that came from his promotion of the Republican agenda.
As Rush opens the hour he has a question; a question for you liberals. He wants to know Why do you want Terri Schiavo to die?
Im on the opposite side of this issue from Rush, Hannity, Liddy and most of my not-liberal talk radio colleagues. So the question intrigued me. Why, indeed, do I want Terri Schiavo to die?
Rushs question deserved an answer. Not some glib response, but an honest, heartfelt answer. So, heres mine.
I want Terri Schiavo to die because I believe shes earned it.
I dont view death as the end of the journey of a human soul. I view it as a transition. The God I believe in would not waste the total life experiences of a man or woman made in his image on a total and complete death; a dead end, if you will, with nothing to follow. I cannot believe that it is Gods plan that the life experiences of a man; wisdom gained, lessons learned and love experienced, should, upon death, disappear as if they never were. I believe that theres something to follow the life we know on this earth; and I believe that most of the people fighting to keep the body of Terri Schiavo alive feel the same way.
These feelings give rise to some questions of my own; questions for the devoutly religious people who are fighting to keep Terri Schiavo alive. Do you believe in Gods promise of everlasting life? Do you believe that the reward for a life well spent on this earth is a life with God in heaven after you die? If you do, then a few more questions if you will.
Do you believe that the human soul can make the transition to everlasting life while the human body that carried that soul through life clings to life on this earth? If you do, then you must surely believe that Terri Schiavo has earned and is already enjoying her reward in heaven. That being the case, why is it so important to you that the now-unneeded body of Terri Schiavo is kept alive?
But perhaps you believe, as I do, that the human soul is so connected to and integrated with its earthly body that any transition will not be made until that body ceases functioning -- until death occurs.. That being the case, why do you so ardently desire that the soul of Terri Schiavo spend five, ten, perhaps 30 years or more trapped in a useless and non-functioning body, unable to move on to whatever reward awaits her? Isnt 15 years enough?
Where do your concerns truly lie, with the eternal soul of Terri Schiavo, or with her earthly body?
Most of us are aware of the stories related by people who have near-death experiences. The usual scenario is a surgical procedure or some other medical emergency. These people describe a sensation of leaving their body at the very time the heart stops beating and the brain ceases functioning. They tell of floating above their body while watching doctors below working hard to resuscitate, to bring them back to life. As the heart once again starts beating and as the brain resumes its functions, they tell of a sensation of falling back into their own bodies to resume life.
We dont hear from the patients upon whom resuscitation efforts are not successful. We dont hear from them because theyve left us. Theyre gone to experience whatever lies beyond. They died.
Is it possible that the soul of Terri Schiavo has been floating held in some prolonged and excruciating limbo waiting for doctors to stop interfering with the process of her death? I believe that this is so, and that is why I have supported her husbands desires to have her feeding tube removed. Terri Schiavo isnt being murdered. Shes being allowed to die. Death will not be an end for Terri Schiavo, it will be a beginning. She will finally be allowed to claim the reward that ultimately we all seek, a reward shes earned and deserves.
Boortz Ping!
If you want on or off the Boortz Ping list, freepmail me.
This is a low volume ping list.
I don't get this guy's show in my area, but can he be so blind? Because he doesn't "view death as the end of the journey of a human soul," he wants a defenseless woman to be starved to death? This guy makes a living thinking like this?
The problem with this line of argument is the lack of its proponents who have committed suicide.
If I were sure that Terri wanted to die this way, she would get my blessing. Unfortunately all we have is the word of an ex husband who got what he could get and only then decided that his wife wished to die.
But quite an interesting argument.
So, Michael has earned the job of killing her? Of course, if Terri is being martyred and this death thus glorifies God in the face of the heathen, then we may soon be in the position of venerating her with all the Saints. But that is afterward. While we still can, we must always speak out against such murder, espeically when done under color of judicial privilege, and say that this is inhuman treatment.
I so believe.
It's interesting to see that Neal Boortz has elevated himself to the position of Creator/God.
He thinks he has the right/power to decide who has "earned" death and who hasn't.
A very slippery slope, indeed.
He's diluted.
Terri hasn't earned DEATH. It's being forced upon her by her by an evil husband and an out of control, death-biased court.
She probably only has a day or two left before she's dead unless George or Jeb step in, and this nation, mark my words, if she dies, these United States will never be the same.
I'm still on the side of life, but it's a good argument.
Boortz should see how well he does denying himself any kind of liquid or food for just 24 hours. It's right to die, it's not right to force some one to die by denying them watr and food. Why does this man CHOOSE not to understand this?
"I dont view death as the end of the journey of a human soul. I view it as a transition"
I daresay that none all of the people fighting to save Terri view death as the end of the journey of a human soul, either.
Maybe the guy who murdered the little girl in Georgia figured she had "earned" the right to be with God. Keeping her trapped in her earthly nine year-old body was just too cruel, especially after he raped her.
I know what I would want for myself. But that is irrelevant to the question. I don't know what I would want for a loved one, or even a complete stranger. And I don't know what is "best" for them; each case is unique.
I don't know why it's important that I answer the question. I do know why a certain class of really bad people keep insisting that I must.
I wish I could remember which past president said it: Perhaps there is no stronger (negative) impulse in human nature than the desire to lay down rules of conduct -- for others.
Fortunately for Mrs. Schiavo (and everyone else), state and federal constitutions exist to protect individuals from people who appoint themselves as chief executive officer over other people's lives.
Now, is there a body anywhere that understands its constitutional responsibilities, and the constitutional use of force?
Diluted?
Well put.
IMO, most folks don't really know what they, themselves would want in this case (even if it were what they presume it to be), but they find it easy to dismiss another person's life because it has no real connection to them. They claim that God will take care of her after she dies. I guess that they don't feel that God is capable of taking care of her as she lives, too. I find it disgustingly amazing that all these folks who would snuff out a life because of an opinion, also claim to know God.
I would ask Mr. Boortz the following:
1. If Terri is no longer actually "living", why not just give her a lethal dose of morphine and end it quickly?
Because that WOULD be murder? Noooo...we can't quickly end someone's life "because she's earned it"...depriving her of water (she's not starving as much as she's dying for lack of water) is the answer. That way, Felos/Greer/Shiavo can't be accused of "murder".
I think the bottom line is that we've got a country (Florida, in particular) full of high-dollar lawyers who will convince judges of anything you want...and activist judges who will pass legislation on anything you want.
just my opinion; counts for nothing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.