Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus
He's absolutely correct.


You are absolutely right!

I heard some of the reasons they didn't convict and this jury was dumber than a box of rocks, who think every case should go a smooth as an episode of C.S.I.


All evidence pointed to Blake and no one else.
43 posted on 03/24/2005 5:41:44 AM PST by dagoofyfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: dagoofyfoot
Statistically, what do you think the odds are of picking 12 random individuals and all of them turning out to be stupid.

It much more likely you have a stupid prosecutor.

46 posted on 03/24/2005 5:47:15 AM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: dagoofyfoot
All evidence pointed to Blake and no one else.

There was no evidence pointing to Blake

The DA based his case on motive (share by Balke as an army os suckers Nakley conned) and the testimony of a couple of whacked=out sleazebags.

The Jury wasn'r buying

79 posted on 03/24/2005 3:26:22 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Here to help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: dagoofyfoot
All evidence pointed to Blake and no one else.

There was no evidence pointing to Blake

The DA based his case on motive (shared by Blake and an army of suckers Nakley conned) and the testimony of a couple of whacked=out sleazebags.

The Jury wasn'r buying

80 posted on 03/24/2005 3:27:15 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Here to help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson