To: Cincinatus
He's absolutely correct.
You are absolutely right!
I heard some of the reasons they didn't convict and this jury was dumber than a box of rocks, who think every case should go a smooth as an episode of C.S.I.
All evidence pointed to Blake and no one else.
To: dagoofyfoot
Statistically, what do you think the odds are of picking 12 random individuals and all of them turning out to be stupid.
It much more likely you have a stupid prosecutor.
To: dagoofyfoot
All evidence pointed to Blake and no one else. There was no evidence pointing to Blake
The DA based his case on motive (share by Balke as an army os suckers Nakley conned) and the testimony of a couple of whacked=out sleazebags.
The Jury wasn'r buying
79 posted on
03/24/2005 3:26:22 PM PST by
Oztrich Boy
(Here to help)
To: dagoofyfoot
All evidence pointed to Blake and no one else. There was no evidence pointing to Blake
The DA based his case on motive (shared by Blake and an army of suckers Nakley conned) and the testimony of a couple of whacked=out sleazebags.
The Jury wasn'r buying
80 posted on
03/24/2005 3:27:15 PM PST by
Oztrich Boy
(Here to help)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson