Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nimbysrule

Clarification please.

Are you saying that Mary Jo Koepechne's death achieved the goal of preventing Ted from being President? I'm not disagreeing, just want to make sure what you are saying.

Would the higher good -- if Terri is killed -- be that most future judges will most likely have to be pro-life'ers? I hope you are right! What a tremendous sacrifice for both families of these two women.


158 posted on 03/23/2005 8:45:35 PM PST by i_dont_chat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: i_dont_chat

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. His window of opportunity was in the '70's (I think he killed Mary Jo in 1969-?) and had it not been for that, and the subsequent exposure of the coverup, I do believe he would have been President. I must give credit where due, Robert Sherrill of the NY Times was the first MSM person to investigate and expose. I've never forgotten reading his work in NYT Magazine in 1974.

As I've posted on several threads, ad nauseum, I'm ashamed to be a lawyer today. To answer your question, I hope this sparks a movement that goes beyond promoting pro-life judges, questions the (il)legitimacy of judicial tyranny and galvanizes people to force elected representatives to reassert their power. I pray Jeb Bush is the first one.

I have no children and can't begin to say I comprehend what Mary Jo's family and Terri's were/are going through. I am not a traditionally religious person, but I am praying very, very hard right now.


185 posted on 03/23/2005 8:54:45 PM PST by nimbysrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson