Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mom's Mouth Germs Could Spur Premature Birth
HealthDay News ^ | March 23, 2005 | Robert Preidt

Posted on 03/23/2005 4:44:59 PM PST by ConservativeMind

Pregnant women with poor oral health are more likely to deliver prematurely, researchers report.

Their study of nearly 300 women found a significant association between high levels of an oral bacterium, Actinomyces naeslundii genospecies 2 -- associated with tooth decay -- and risk of delivering preterm low birth weight babies.

This is the first research to link preterm delivery with oral bacteria other than the bacteria that cause gum disease. The findings add to growing evidence that a woman's oral health affects the health of her newborn.

A tenfold increase in bacterial levels was associated with a 60-gram decrease in birth weight and about a 1.19 day decrease in the length of pregnancy, researchers at the New York University College of Dentistry report in the latest issue of the Journal of Periodontology.

In a prepared statement, lead researcher Dr. Ananda P. Dasanayake hypothesized that oral bacteria associated with tooth decay and cavities may travel to the uterus. Once in the uterus, the bacteria, along with molecules called proinflammatory mediators (released by the body in response to the bacteria), could lead to uterine contractions and cervical dilation.

She speculated that when the cervix is dilated, more bacteria enter -- eventually causing the uterine membranes to rupture, resulting in preterm birth.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cavitycreeps; health; pregnancy; prenatal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
This is another way to prevent pre-term births while improving the lives of mother and child.
1 posted on 03/23/2005 4:45:01 PM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Correlation does NOT equal causality.


2 posted on 03/23/2005 4:47:37 PM PST by Gabz (Wanna join my tag team?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
See many decayed teeth in third world populations; am wondering if 'premies' are a standard there; or do they handle bacteria better than 'we' do. . .

Not to mention a host of other possibillities for whatever the stats may be. . .

3 posted on 03/23/2005 4:47:51 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Those evil Cavity Creeps strike again!


4 posted on 03/23/2005 4:51:35 PM PST by Constitution Day ("Please do not emanate into the penumbra.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Untrue! 'Mother-spit' is the universal solvent. Eye-boogers, ketchup stains, smudges--you name it.


5 posted on 03/23/2005 4:59:22 PM PST by OkieDoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I presume hubby or S.O. mouth germs were ruled out?


6 posted on 03/23/2005 5:05:13 PM PST by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
May travel to the uterus? They don't even know if the bacteria does and yet they've released this?
7 posted on 03/23/2005 5:09:28 PM PST by ShadowDancer (As for the types of comments I make,sometimes I just, By God,get carried away with my own eloquence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

This could explain the low population of West VA.


8 posted on 03/23/2005 5:10:29 PM PST by KoRn (~Halliburton Told Me......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Then again, Europe could disprove this theory.


9 posted on 03/23/2005 5:18:25 PM PST by KoRn (~Halliburton Told Me......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
They don't even know if the bacteria does and yet they've released this?

Of course. The may in the findings is how they will continue to receive grant funding for more specious "research."

10 posted on 03/23/2005 5:19:14 PM PST by Gabz (Wanna join my tag team?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

I have a hypothesis on how many morons it takes to create a study, get funding for it and then never really come up with a direct correlation. Where do I apply for my grant money?


11 posted on 03/23/2005 5:20:57 PM PST by ShadowDancer (As for the types of comments I make,sometimes I just, By God,get carried away with my own eloquence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Hope so since I am obsessive about clean teeth and mouth and all my babies have weighted in at 9.5-10 lbs and 22-23 inches long.
12 posted on 03/23/2005 5:23:17 PM PST by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Sheese! Who dreams up these studies?
13 posted on 03/23/2005 5:23:40 PM PST by benjaminjjones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

It may be that women who do not take take of their teeth, do not take care of their health in general.


14 posted on 03/23/2005 5:27:49 PM PST by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

I want to share in some of the grant money, too!!!!!!!!!!!


15 posted on 03/23/2005 5:38:53 PM PST by Gabz (Wanna join my tag team?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: roylene

It never mattered how obsessive I was about clean teeth, mouth, gums - my teeth were always cavity prone - as are those of many other members of my family. Except my brother - he had horrendous habits about his mouth and rarely ever had a cavity.

You had big babies - God Bless you. I have 1 and she came in just shy of 6 pounds and 18.5 inches long. The fact that I only weighed about 105-110 when I conceived probably has nothing to do with that :)


16 posted on 03/23/2005 5:45:12 PM PST by Gabz (Wanna join my tag team?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: knuthom
It may be that women who do not take take of their teeth, do not take care of their health in general.

Seems like an obvious conclusion, doesn't it? Wonder why they didn't mention it.

17 posted on 03/23/2005 6:14:37 PM PST by not_apathetic_anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I guess oral sex is out, then.


18 posted on 03/23/2005 6:23:24 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

AHHHHHH....HAHAHAHAHAHHHHHH!!! I heard that the toothbrush was invented in W. Va. It was theorized that had it been invented anywhere else on earth, it would have been called a teethbrush.


19 posted on 03/23/2005 6:33:36 PM PST by NC Native ("Bombing begins in five minutes"... Ronald W. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Many pregnant women have a diffucult time maintaining adequate plaque control due to nausea and a heightened gag reflex. Some women resort to having to brush with only plain water and a baby toothbrush. When gums bleed, plaque bacteria get into the bloodstream. In a normal, healthy individual this doesn't present a problem, but who knows what effect it has on the fetus.


20 posted on 03/23/2005 6:36:53 PM PST by toothfairy86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson