Forget it. The pro-Terri side has gone over the edge. Any such arguments are lost on them.
Rule of law is one thing, Rule of Judiciary is another.
Thus far everything that has been done to save this woman's life has been with a deference to the the constitutional principles of separation of powers and federalism. Yet, this woman for whatever reason has fallen prey to a legal cesspool.
Barring an unlikely save from Justice Kennedy, any action taken by the Florida executive branch would be extra-constitutional. I have read the statute that DCF believes allows them to take custody of Terri Schiavo. They would be on shaky legal grounds to say the least.
At what point do you say enough is enough? This woman has a right to life. If the US Constitution cannot protect her, than natural law principles ought to. The judiciary pulls rulings out of thin air all the time, why can't the executive use precepts outside of our legal realm to save this woman's life?
I guess you are the anti-Terri side.You are so brave probably sitting their with your 4 course meal in front of you with plenty of liquid. The anti terri side tells everyone that they think handicapped people are disgusting and not worth living. You also think it is ok for an abusive husband to render his wife in that condition,sue the hospital,piss the award money away on Felos,and after you have spent the money dump her off on Hospice so you can have sex and bear two children out of wedlock while you are shacking up. You then must feel it is ok to let that same filthy degenerate 6ft7inch bully be her guardian ad litem and insist that she die. You have the potentional to be a liberal demoncrap if you are not already. I would not want you to baby sit my alligator.