Posted on 03/23/2005 9:01:53 AM PST by areafiftyone
Congressional Republicans who took extraordinary measures last weekend to prolong the life of Terri Schiavo say there are no further steps Congress can take to intervene.
A federal district-court judge declined yesterday to issue an order to reinsert Schiavos feeding tube. Schiavos parents have appealed the ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta.
The court ruling concerning the Florida woman whom doctors say has been in a persistent vegetative state for 15 years prompted a strong statement from House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), who said that the court violated the clear intent of Congress, which passed a emergency Schiavo bill last weekend.
Sen. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.), who drafted legislation that served as starting point for a narrower bill passed by the Senate, said, I am deeply disappointed by this decision today, but I believe this matter now belongs in the hands of the judiciary.
DeLay went further, saying, Congress explicitly provided Terri Schiavos family recourse to federal court, and this decision is at odds with both the clear intent of Congress and the constitutional rights of a helpless young woman.
Section two of the legislation we passed clearly requires the court determine de novo the merits of the case or in laymans terms, it requires a completely new and full review of the case.
Section three requires the judge to grant a temporary restraining order because he cannot fulfill his or her recognized duty to review the case de novo without first keeping Terri Schiavo alive.
DeLay did not, however, signal any further steps that Congress might take.
Section three of the Schiavo law states that the judge shall issue such declaratory and injunctive relief as may be necessary to protect the rights of Schiavo.
But Senate floor statements appear to contradict DeLays interpretation. An earlier version of the bill included language mandating that the court issue a stay. Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) objected to the provision and negotiated to have it removed. GOP leaders needed the consent of Senate Democrats to move the bill in a speedy fashion, and during a House floor speech DeLay later thanked Senate Democrats for their cooperation.
During Senate consideration of the bill Sunday, Levin engaged in a colloquy, or conversation on the floor, with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), stating his belief that the bill would not require the court to issue a stay.
Frist agreed, saying, Nothing in the current bill or its legislative history mandates a stay. I would assume, however, the federal court would grant a stay based on the facts of this case because Mrs. Schiavo would need to be alive in order for the court to make its determination. Nevertheless, this bill does not change current law, under which a stay is discretionary.
A House Judiciary Committee aide said that the final law was stronger than the initial Senate bill and that it did require the judge to issue a stay.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) also released a statement, saying that he was very disappointed by the court ruling.
Time is working against Republicans who would like to do more on Schiavos behalf. At best, if the case goes to the U.S. Supreme Court, lawmakers might decide to file friend-of-the-court briefs on behalf of Schiavos parents.
Legislative provisions negotiated by Senate Democrats during the hours before Congress acted last weekend appear to have had a substantial effect on the case.
When Frist first moved to take up a bill dealing with Schiavo in the midst of a budget debate, Democrats objected. One who objected was Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who was concerned that the legislation could have an effect on an Oregon law dealing with assisted suicide.
As a result of negotiations with Wyden, the final law included language stating that it should not be construed to give new jurisdiction to courts regarding a states assisted suicide law. Wyden did not object to final action, even though he opposed the bill.
Democratic aides said their members decided to allow the bill to move forward once it was changed so that it was narrowly tailored to the Schiavo case. An ABC News poll released Monday showed that 70 percent of respondents thought the congressional intervention was inappropriate.
Just because members oppose a bill doesnt mean they exercise every procedural option to block it, one Senate Democratic aide said. The bill eventually passed the Senate on a voice vote, after no senator demanded a recorded vote be taken.
Meanwhile, Frist wrote Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) yesterday urging quick action on the part of the state Legislature: The extraordinary nature of this case requires that every avenue be pursued to protect her life.
If I were making book in Las Vegas, I think the odds must be 100-1 in favor of cremation of the body. And probably 10-1 that the ashes will be scattered and not interned.
That and two bucks fifty will get you a cuppa joe at Starbucks.
I think you meant "interred", although with WJC still around...
What I want to see is the first case of a death row inmate going into a "persistant vegetative state." Boy, that'll make some heads explode. (Evil grin).
I was wondering why the Democratic Senators did not protest the Bill to save Terri. I now know why. They knew or made sure that the Federal courts would not act. Evil is clever.
Can you direct me again to the Law. I can't find my bookmark. Thanks.
What I want to see is the first case of a death row inmate going into a "persistant vegetative state." Boy, that'll make some heads explode.
He would still get all his appeals exhausted for 20 years while in a PVS.
$2.50?
Where do you live? It costs 3.25 around here.
Yeah right. So they worked late.
That's the end for me. I really don't care whether I am irrelevant anymore, my money is just as well spent on local candidates in the Constitution Party.
hear hear.
Why do you assume 'he?' Gawd, I'm evil today....lol
It was just a guess - I've never been there.
Don't you mean the Deathocrats?
I think forever on that should be how we refer to them. Never again is DEMOcrat or even DUMBocrat to come out of my mouth or written by me.
Deeply disappointed, deeply saddened, hamburger, effin, cheeseburger.
Yeah! That'll show them!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.