Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Santorum Was Right: Meet the future of marriage in America.
National Review Online ^ | March 23, 2005 | Stanley Kurtz

Posted on 03/23/2005 8:46:11 AM PST by DBeers

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 03/23/2005 8:46:12 AM PST by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K; little jeremiah

PING.


2 posted on 03/23/2005 8:50:36 AM PST by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Heinlein already did all the footwork for any "scholar" in this.

Read "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress"


3 posted on 03/23/2005 8:52:20 AM PST by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

And my response to this is... is Western Civilization doomed? We face dire threats from without in the War on Terror, and assaults on our institutions from within by liberal nut cases who are obsessed with mainstream acceptance and endorsement of their sex lives. It's enough to drive a person to despair.


4 posted on 03/23/2005 8:53:44 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

5 posted on 03/23/2005 8:56:47 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Schiavo case has shown bigamy is OK.

He's married legally to Terri Schiavo despite living as husband to another woman and fathering and raising two children with her.

Yet the legal system still says he is Terri Schiavo's wife.

How, therefore can polygamist marriage be denied given this precedent.

6 posted on 03/23/2005 8:57:49 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: DBeers

Basically this would be statutory sanction and approval of the free love lifestyle of a 1960's hippie commune.


8 posted on 03/23/2005 8:59:05 AM PST by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Bookmarking.


9 posted on 03/23/2005 9:00:10 AM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

What a piece of filth.


10 posted on 03/23/2005 9:05:01 AM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Although I haven't ever considered Rick Santorum a fount of wisdom, this is one area where he is right. Once you, as a California court now has, establish a right to marry who you choose, you do open the door to not only gay marriage, but incestuous marriage, bestiality, bigamy, polygamy, etc.


11 posted on 03/23/2005 9:08:17 AM PST by mak5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobjam

Or Islam and the tradition of up to 5 wives.


12 posted on 03/23/2005 9:12:31 AM PST by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

I want to marry my Playstation /sarcasm>

Defending marriage bump!


13 posted on 03/23/2005 9:13:18 AM PST by Nowhere Man (I hope you enjoyed your dinner, Terri Schiavo can't. B-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mak5

I have already been in a California incestuous marriage, having been married to my first cousin.

Well, technically it was a consanguinous marriage, but still.


14 posted on 03/23/2005 9:15:45 AM PST by donmeaker (Burn the UN flag publicly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: DBeers
You can be "partners" and live with as many people as you wish - the law will not interfere. It only recognizes one partner as valid.

Maybe the law should start treating people as individual taxpayers. That would put an end to most of these arguments.

16 posted on 03/23/2005 9:19:38 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Schiavo case has shown bigamy is OK.

In my opinion, no-fault divorce did this. The Schiavo case just takes it one step further. Now instead of don't ask don't tell its so what...

17 posted on 03/23/2005 9:20:10 AM PST by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
Or Islam and the tradition of up to 5 wives.

Polygamy goes back to the time of the Old Testament patriarchs. The polygamists have a stronger case than do the homosexuals.

18 posted on 03/23/2005 9:21:15 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
According to Emens, whether for biological or cultural reasons, some folks simply cannot live happily unless they are allowed multiple, simultaneous sexual partners.

Well, life is tough.

Hmmm . . . maintain the moral underpinnings of Western culture or allow a few self-absorbed perverts to "live happily" . . . oh, that's a tough choice.

19 posted on 03/23/2005 9:21:35 AM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blownawaybylibs

"technically i think it's 4 wives"

It's four wives "on earth". If you want more, you have to keep them on boats.


20 posted on 03/23/2005 9:40:10 AM PST by Flash Bazbeaux ("I'll have the moo goo gai pan without the pan, and some pans.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson