Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A CA Guy

You are right. This is so ridiculous it's not funny. There are no complexities here, none whatsoever. Terri's "husband" wants her dead and Terri's immediate family does not. That's it. Case closed.

The judges(lawyers) that have so far been involved with this case have either been "pro euthanasia" and/or Clinton appointees. You have 3-4 people "voting" on such an explosive issue. I know you can't have a general election over this but at the very least there should be an attempt to provide "level plaing field".


55 posted on 03/23/2005 1:02:09 AM PST by RacerX1128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: RacerX1128

In brief, I heard Hannity a bit earlier. He had two nurses that cared for her.
Both nurses were pressured by Terri's husband to NOT CARE FOR HER.
I also heard rather reputable doctors that went in and said Terri was responsive.

So with that on the plate, how the hell can a court giver her the death penalty?
They should have just sentenced her to death officially, so the court of appeals could give her 15 future court reviews and another 20 years of life before her execution.


61 posted on 03/23/2005 1:09:38 AM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson