" Accusing a judge of being on the take is a heckuva charge."
Why else would someone order that a disabled woman be deprived of water until she dies of thirst? A logical person can only assume that the judge is either insane or in on the take.
Things in this nation are getting scary. We need that "constitutional option"!
He's following the law. The husband is the legal guardian. He has made this decision. The judge cannot find any legal reason to deviate from the law.
Freepers usually flip out when a judge substitutes their personal views over the letter of the law, and yet they're calling this judge names for refusing to be an activist.