Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach

OK, like I said, if a feeding tube is 'life-support' treatment....why has the judge forbade anyone from even attempting to try and feed her orally?

Also, having watched the proceedings on the house floor from start to finish, I can tell you that most of the situations offered as comparisons are not that at all.

Last I checked, euthanasia was not legal on a federal level and it is not legal in FL.

Prohibiting ANY attempt at feeding this poor woman will produce certain death and is therefore euthanasia.


337 posted on 03/22/2005 12:13:59 PM PST by Ethrane ("semper consolar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]


To: Ethrane
OK, like I said, if a feeding tube is 'life-support' treatment....why has the judge forbade anyone from even attempting to try and feed her orally?
That's a good question. Do we know for a FACT that the judge forbade this in his decision? I'll admit I haven't read the complete decision.
341 posted on 03/22/2005 12:16:20 PM PST by sola_fide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

To: Ethrane

Terri's tube was put in before she even left the first hospital -
http://www.terrisfight.org/documents/Humana%20Discharge%20Summary%20050990.pdf

She could not swallow then, nor could she pass the yearly swallow tests done on her in those first three critical years when she was having rigorous therapy.

This is why no one has fed her orally. She can't do it.


351 posted on 03/22/2005 12:24:52 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson