Skip to comments.Judges Gone Wild - The deteriorating liberal judiciary…
Posted on 03/22/2005 8:44:12 AM PST by NormsRevenge
They learn it in school. And it is obscene. How they get away with it, I dont know, but you see this obnoxious and obscene behavior everywhere.
It is what you see on the news everyday of our courts out of controlof our judges gone wild. Wild in the sense that they believe they are not restricted or controlled by the constitutions of our federal or state government, the laws enacted by those governments, or the traditions of the judiciary developed pursuant to the constitutions and the principles of this country. These judges gone wild need to read Montesquieu, and his principle of separation of powers.
It was unusual at the time of our founding for the judicial and legislative powers to be separated. Montesquieu thought combining these powers was dangerous. If a judge writes the law, and then applies it, the judge loses the objectivity that is necessary to fairly and impartially apply the law. If, on the other hand, the judge is free to ignore the law, and apply his or her own whim, the law becomes arbitrary; the society is governed by the rule of man, not the rule of law.
In California, the rule of law is in danger. A judge in San Francisco ruled that the California Constitution, enacted in 1870, prohibits discrimination in our marriage laws against homosexuals. Put aside the fact that the laws of marriage are equally applied. Every man, regardless of sexual orientation, can marry a woman, and every woman, regardless of sexual orientation, can marry a man. The more important issue is that no rational person can maintain that the people of this state, at the time the Constitution was enacted, intended any part of that constitution to require that the state recognize same sex marriage. The judge in this case just ignored that common sense proposition, and rewrote the Constitution. The judge ruled that our Constitution required the state to recognize marriage between two men or two women.
The ruling is nonsensical, but understandable because this judge has to face the voters of San Francisco in his next election. Increasingly, judges are all too willing to abandon their oaths of office to mimic popular culture. Our Supreme Court recently ruled that certain international laws and treaties (that did not exist when our Constitution was drafted) ought to define the meaning of our constitutional principles. Now, a judge in California simply ignored history and precedent, and rewrote the California Constitution, ignoring the will of over 62% of the California electorate. This is the picture of a judge gone wild.
These judges are taught to do this in law school. They are taught that the Constitution is a living thing, a thing whos meaning changes with the times. While it is true that the principles of the Constitution are timeless, their meanings do not change. Changing the Constitution requires an amendment, enacted by the Legislature and put before the people to gain their assent. A judge that changes constitutional principles without an amendment is acting like a lawmaker, and that is outside his or her power or expertise.
Elected representatives are designated as the lawmakers because they are in the best position to balance the needs of their constituents. They are in the best position because they are held accountable for their decisions on laws through the electoral process. Lawmakers set the rules under which disputes are resolved, judges resolve the disputes. When judges cross the line, and start to write the rules, they undermine the system. Those who wrote the Constitution understood how to strike the balance. The judge in San Francisco obviously did not.
Judges gone wild is not a pretty sight. It is destroying the peoples faith in our judicial system.
It's Bush's fault unless he responds with force, because that's all that's left when the law doesn't matter.
The Commies said they would destroy us from within; Judicial, Government, Schools,Unions etc etc.
It is a common theme across all facets of our society, as we are under attack from enemies within.
But the commies never considered the internet and the millions and millions of proles with new flashlights. It ain't the cakewalk it use to be for the agents of satan.
And the "law doesn't matter," because our "scheme of laws" has become such a tangled web of over-lapping entanglements as to have created an out-of-control-judiciary! Like all the rest of "non-elected" government that lawmakers have over-delegated undue authority to, the Judicial Branch has become like mice who play while the cat's away!
Our very own Representatives in Congress and State Legislatures are the only ones to blame and must regain their oversight and control of this runaway situation... but they just won't. They'll run and hide and blame somebody else, like Clinton did, because everyone in government must look good at all times!
That's their "prime directive" which is all "public relations," all the time!!!
"Judges Gone Wild". Somehow, I don't think we'll be seeing Snoop Dog advertising this as the next installment of the "Girls Gone Wild" DVDs.
I agree - and this statement says it all: "that they believe they are not restricted or controlled by the constitutions of our federal or state government, the laws enacted by those governments, or the traditions of the judiciary developed pursuant to the constitutions and the principles of this country."
The judiciary is out of control - and that's exactly what the democrats want. They want to be able to RULE BY JUDICIAL DECREE - and not be bound by the constraints of the Constitution.
Isn't it amazing that the polls do NOT take these facts above into their view that Congressional interventon was a necessity since even murderers get reviews. In fact, too many reviews! Dems sure love the culture of death and think that the courts are their last refuge for power. They cannot get elected to higher places and know that unelected jurists are their only hope for power. It is time that legislatures start limiting the power of courts on all levels by term limits etc.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
"unelected jurists are their only hope for power"
I totally agree .. and then it's the same liberals who want the juvenile KILLERS to be allowed life instead of death.
That's a total opposite opinion of what I believe. They want bad people to live and good people to die - and I believe just the opposite. I don't favor KILLING people as a general practice - but for some brutal murderers - why not put the person to death - if the state's laws allow it.
And speaking of state's laws - in the juvenile killers ruling - the liberals were overjoyed to have the USSC overrule the STATE'S RIGHTS TO KILL JUVENILE KILLERS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.