I respect the guy for refering to the Constitution on this matter, rather than the Bible.
Had he voted with the Church, he would be another activist judge.
Look this someone's innocent life. You shouldn't have to go to the Bible to understand that starving someone to death who otherwise would have a long life is WRONG. The details i this case are disturbing. Some of those details include the fact that Mr. Schiavo is already married, and that he didnt' change his view that terri would have long life until after he received his finacial settlement. Until then and in court, his view that he would have to care for her the rest of her life. Also the burden of proof for what is in effect ordering the death of this woman, should be higher than hearsay. And this Judges claim that his order is not killing this woman but rather it is her wishes that is killing this woman is avoidance of the facts. This Judge IS ordering her death. There is no way around that. I am a conservative and outside of these kinds of life issues I think the Gov. should be in our lives as minimal as is practical, however this is so WRONG so DISTATEFUL and so HEINOUS that I believe that that justice is being horribly twisted and that if noble men in postions to do something about this shoudl act. The same was true of slavery, where a whole slew of misguided judges ruled that blacks were less than human..including the sumpreme court. THe court SHOULD NOT be in the business of determining our humanity, and should prevent others from doing so. These are GOD given rights, until they change this in our founding documents. And when they do, I fear we will all be living a State whose God is themselves, and whose worth will be determined by the State. Don't think it can't happen. If the State Errs on the side of attributing worth to someone , I'll live with that. It's the other side of that coin which we should stop and which we are attempting to stop here.