Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SendShaqtoIraq
Give me a break. There's less than zero evidence he paid witnesses or promised payment to witnesses.

Please, enough with the tin foil hat brigade!

The money "won" in the malpractice has been used 1. for her care because that's expensive and 2. for legal action, presumably, to help put her to rest. That money is gone. How, again, is Michael coming out ahead in your latest conspiracy theory?

254 posted on 03/22/2005 4:16:49 AM PST by newzjunkey (Demand Mexico Turnover Fugitive Murderers: http://www.escapingjustice.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey
Tell me, why is it that Michael suddenly had the revelation that his wife didn't want a feeding tube EIGHT YEARS after she collapsed?
269 posted on 03/22/2005 4:19:28 AM PST by Tree of Liberty (requiescat in pace, President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

I think what MS has to gain from her death is relief,,imagine you have done a great wrong to another. The wrong could be anything from strangling her, from making her life a hell, from secretly wanting her to die so you had her money, from betraying her.

Imagine all that. And the evidence, the living breathing human you did the wrong to, demands your time because you have to keep watching and keeping others from helping her.

The woman, terri, lives and breathes and haunts MS, she stands in his way of forgetting and going on to the next part of his life. She is a testament, a monument, to his misdeeds.

She has to die so he can move along.


270 posted on 03/22/2005 4:20:09 AM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey
Why don't you break down for us exactly how much was spent for Terri's care,
and how much he spent on legal actions to have her euthanised, so he could
"move on"?
275 posted on 03/22/2005 4:21:25 AM PST by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

He admitted it on national TV. You guys have no more argument.


300 posted on 03/22/2005 4:26:44 AM PST by greccogirl ("Freedom belongs to those who are willing to sacrifice the most for it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey
The money "won" in the malpractice has been used 1. for her care because that's expensive and 2. for legal action, presumably, to help put her to rest. That money is gone. How, again, is Michael coming out ahead in your latest conspiracy theory?

The attorney named Fox who won the case for Michael stated the award was between two and three million. Michael has spent slightly over one million, and so the money is not gone.
301 posted on 03/22/2005 4:26:56 AM PST by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey
The money "won" in the malpractice has been used 1. for her care because that's expensive and 2. for legal action, presumably, to help put her to rest. That money is gone. How, again, is Michael coming out ahead in your latest conspiracy theory?

Wrong!

The money for the legal action was for the legal representation on that case, not future cases. Why would he be awarded over a million dollars to care for her (and rehabilitate) for the rest of natural life, and at the same time be awarded money to end her life before it would have ended naturally

327 posted on 03/22/2005 4:32:03 AM PST by feedback doctor (Mark Sanford and Condi Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

"Give me a break. There's less than zero evidence he paid witnesses or promised payment to witnesses."

When has anyone looked?
"Please, enough with the tin foil hat brigade!"

Call it what you want, there is something seriously wrong here. If he wants to remarry, all he has to do is get a divorce. What would it hurt to let her parents take care of her?

"The money "won" in the malpractice has been used 1. for her care because that's expensive"

Wrong. She's on Medicaid.

"and 2. for legal action, presumably, to help put her to rest."

Well you got this part parially right. He's spending it all trying to put her to DEATH.

"That money is gone. How, again, is Michael coming out ahead in your latest conspiracy theory?"

He's getting out of an attempted murder charge and staying out of prison.


343 posted on 03/22/2005 4:35:32 AM PST by SendShaqtoIraq (Reggie, we will always love you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson