Skip to comments.
Judge Refuses to have feeding tube reinserted in Terri Schiavo (FOX NEWS ALERT)
Fox News
| 03/22/05
Posted on 03/22/2005 3:26:06 AM PST by tsmith130
Just heard on Fox....so sad.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: contrarymarytroll; cultureofdeath; deathcultivation; federalism; federaljudge; feedingtube; florida; investigatemichael; investigatemikenow; judgewhittemore; justice; lethergotojesus; overblown; prayers; privacy; righttodie; schiavo; sicsempertyranis; soapopera; terri; terrischiavo; terrishiavo; uselesseaters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,141 next last
To: Mo1
Both--the case has been refused by the USSC, and they've been ruled against by the Florida supremes.
41
posted on
03/22/2005 3:36:03 AM PST
by
Catspaw
To: cajungirl
"He will let her die while he does a leisurely review of the evidence, break for lunch, play with his grandchildren, maybe take in a movie to break the stress."
Considering the fact he is a Clinton appointee, he would also be headed to the day spa for a mudbath and manicure and also taking a little "me-time" to watch Ellen on Oh!.
42
posted on
03/22/2005 3:36:11 AM PST
by
MisterRepublican
(I DEMAND THAT FOX NEWS GET JENNIFER ECCLESTON BACK FROM NBC!)
To: mewzilla
But there are just so many hours in a day, looks like design to me, slowing the process down by the judge assuring her death.
We live in a sick world don't we.
To: Tarantulas
And this ruling respects Terri's wishes. What if her husband is lying?
44
posted on
03/22/2005 3:36:30 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
To: Tarantulas
It would have been unconstitutional for him to rule otherwise. Trusting you're a legal scholar, perhaps you can explain this in a sentence or two.
Comment #46 Removed by Moderator
To: grania
Are you surprised your non-Clintonista president and governor haven't granted a stay of execution? Yes, because isn't it every King's President's right to interfere in the lives of his citizens and block their preferences?
47
posted on
03/22/2005 3:36:45 AM PST
by
Gondring
(They can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold, dead hands!)
To: tsmith130
Another victory for the pro-death liberals. And Clinton's legacy continues on. How sad.
48
posted on
03/22/2005 3:36:57 AM PST
by
mek1959
To: Dog
Yes, I know the USSC has refused to hear the case. The Schindlers legal options are quickly closing.
49
posted on
03/22/2005 3:37:41 AM PST
by
Catspaw
To: grania
I have noticed that W and Jeb are trying 'within the law' to save her.
50
posted on
03/22/2005 3:38:07 AM PST
by
mathluv
To: tsmith130
SCUM
To: grania
Are you surprised your non-Clintonista president and governor haven't granted a stay of execution? It is clear that Jeb Bush has acted in the past only to be overruled by the Florida Supreme Court.
George Bush did cut staying at his ranch short to come back to Washington to sign the bill.
That is a lot different than the baby killers Bill and Hillary who enjoyed immense support of Planned Parenthood and NARAL, and fought any attempt to ban Partial Birth Abortion tooth and nail.
52
posted on
03/22/2005 3:38:27 AM PST
by
topher
(Pray for our leaders -- Pray for Justice for Terri Schiavo -- let her live!)
To: tsmith130
I had doubts early on about Whittemore since he was a Clinton appointee.
I doubt the 11th Circuit Appeals Court in Atlanta will not wait over 26 hours to make a ruling on the Schindlers appeal this morning.
To: GABaptist
You know I don't know if talking about the Clintons and DU is really the issue here.
You must remember republican judge Greer is the one who has let this go on. And democrats voted for the law to protect her.
I think the partisan political stuff does nothing to help Terri at this point and only distracts us.
Just my opinion.
54
posted on
03/22/2005 3:38:36 AM PST
by
cajungirl
(no)
To: Right_in_Virginia
Trusting you're a legal scholar, perhaps you can explain this in a sentence or two.
Two words - States' rights.
To: MisterRepublican
OR, summon his intern.
To: mewzilla
What if her husband is lying? The Judge will decide on that later
57
posted on
03/22/2005 3:38:37 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Why can't the public see Terry - What are they afraid of ??)
To: Catspaw
But since this is now de novo (or however you put it), couldn't the SCOTUS hear it now?
58
posted on
03/22/2005 3:38:47 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
To: tsmith130
The critical issue is how long has she been without water - dehydration will kill her faster than starvation.
Regards, Ivan
59
posted on
03/22/2005 3:38:48 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
Comment #60 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,141 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson