To: conserv13
While this specific issue can be argued one way or another, I think it is very important to remember something about Congress' actions in the Schiavo case and the legal process soon to follow in Federal courts: I could make a more compelling case for Federal involvement in the Schiavo situation than for the U.S. Supreme Court's involvement in
Bush v. Gore I find it odd that none of the Freepers out there who are such high-minded "strict constructionists" in this case were using similar constitutional arguments to support the Florida Supreme Court's decisions (in favor of Al Gore) in the 2000 presidential election.
58 posted on
03/21/2005 12:33:03 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
To: Alberta's Child
I find it odd that none of the Freepers out there who are such high-minded "strict constructionists" in this case were using similar constitutional arguments to support the Florida Supreme Court's decisions (in favor of Al Gore) in the 2000 presidential election.
Oh, I'm sure they were. There exists a hard core group of Bush haters here who have been attacking GWB long before 2000. They'll say or do anything to tear the man down.
67 posted on
03/21/2005 12:36:56 PM PST by
ClintonBeGone
(In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
To: Alberta's Child
I could make a more compelling case for Federal involvement in the Schiavo situation than for the U.S. Supreme Court's involvement in Bush v. GoreNot sure why. The 14th Amendment seems to apply to both cases.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson