Yes, I was dodging the question. Because I shouldn't have to REWRITE what was already stated and said. Go through this thread again. You jumped right in the middle when the question was already answered, by a Constitutional scholar and best selling author.
So we're citing political media personalities now?
Here's one for you:
"For Congress and the president to then step in and try to override that by shifting the venue to a federal court was a legal travesty, a flagrant violation of federalism and the separation of powers. The federal judge who refused to reverse the Florida court was certainly true to the law."
-- Charles Krauthammer
P.S. For Levin to cite the fourteenth amendment in defense of this action is so very typical of lawyer-speak and so very typical of the hypocrisy of the legal profession. The next time some activist judge uses the fourteenth amendment to push a liberal agenda, I feel sure he will be screaming "original intent" at the top of his lungs with the rest of the lemmings.
A pox on media lawyers.