Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
The problem is that as her legal guardian, he does represent her.

He is only her "legal guardian" because he is considered her spouse under the law. In light of the fact that he has taken up with another woman and had two children by her, he has -- for all intents and purposes -- abandoned his wife. As far as I know, shacking up with another woman and having two children out of wedlock would be irrefutable grounds for divorce in any state in the U.S.

Terri has never been given "due process" in this case, as she has never had her own legal counsel appointed to represent her. She needs a lawyer appointed to act on her behalf, and the first thing that lawyer must do is file for divorce on the grounds that I just described.

402 posted on 03/21/2005 8:02:57 PM PST by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
"He is only her "legal guardian" because he is considered her spouse under the law."

What else should the Court consider if not the law?

477 posted on 03/22/2005 3:36:42 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson