The argument is that due process of law has been achieved.
If the facts of the case are as I understand them, then there has been NO due process despite the years of litigation and appeals. At the very least, Terri Schiavo would have to be provided legal counsel to act on her behalf and look out for her interests aside from what her so-called "husband" would want for her.
Yes, for MICHAEL Schiavo there has been due process but not for Terri Schiavo. The attorneys involved have been representing Terri's estranged husband and her parents. What attorneys have represented HER? Some will argue that as her legal guardian, it is the same as representing her, but there is much disagreement on that considering the many questions raised in this case over the years. There are questions of conflicts of interest for example.
I disagree this time Luis. That so called due proccess, has left too many questions just begging for answers.