To: D Rider
How did you come to the conclusion that "nuclear" means "hydrogen" and "atomic" does not?
Somehow you seem to have equated "nuclear" with "fusion" and "atomic" with "fission".
Via what process or set of definitions?
48 posted on
03/21/2005 5:51:26 PM PST by
G Larry
(Aggressively promote conservative judges!)
To: G Larry
How did you come to the conclusion that "nuclear" means "hydrogen" and "atomic" does not? He already retracted that -- see post #18.
To: G Larry
How did you come to the conclusion that "nuclear" means "hydrogen" and "atomic" does not? You should read the rest of the thread before you post. Especially #10 and #18
Also #22 and #23
51 posted on
03/21/2005 6:50:17 PM PST by
D Rider
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson