Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D Rider
How did you come to the conclusion that "nuclear" means "hydrogen" and "atomic" does not?

Somehow you seem to have equated "nuclear" with "fusion" and "atomic" with "fission".
Via what process or set of definitions?
48 posted on 03/21/2005 5:51:26 PM PST by G Larry (Aggressively promote conservative judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: G Larry
How did you come to the conclusion that "nuclear" means "hydrogen" and "atomic" does not?

He already retracted that -- see post #18.

49 posted on 03/21/2005 6:01:49 PM PST by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry
How did you come to the conclusion that "nuclear" means "hydrogen" and "atomic" does not?

You should read the rest of the thread before you post. Especially #10 and #18

Also #22 and #23

51 posted on 03/21/2005 6:50:17 PM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson