[malboro_man]

You know what they say, if you boil a live frog slowly, it won't notice the boiling water. As a result, it won't have time to jump out of the pot until it's too late. Folks, we are the frogs here. Is it already to late to stop the New World Order?

[cyborg]

good article ping

[JesseHousman]

"We will use the law, international law and even U.S. law...

We understand senor Fox.

If worse comes to worse and we can't get enough of our citizens over the border, we may even have to hit you vapid yankees over the head with your own law!

Close the borders, close our embassy, break off diplomatic relations with this poor excuse for a nation now!

In time we'll be dragged down to third world nation status ourselves.

[SittinYonder]

This is exactly what I'm talking about here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1366636/posts?page=120#120

[EagleUSA]

Good article that is on the money. If we analyze what has already happened with this legalized-illegal invasion of our country, combined with Washington's deliberate avoidance of it, we ARE the frogs being boiled. It still amazes me how many people are just sticking their heads in the sand and playing like this is not happening...America had better wake up soon, otherwise America will not be America anymore, and we are half way there already...

[philetus]

I wonder what will happen when a Judge does decree it illegal for U.S. citizens to protect the border.

[azhenfud]

"We will use the law, international law and even U.S. law to make sure that these types of groups, which are a minority ... will not have any opportunity to progress."

It is time Americans demand U.S. law and immigration code be reinforced and enforced. Those who will object will reveal who and what they are.

If President Bush and other U.S. politicians can't see the Mexican governments' attempt to destabilize our nation by undermining our code of law, ours' certainly have a questionable capacity as "leaders".

[sasafras]

Bush is a liberal plain and simple - he cares more about Fox's concerns than the average American. The dems can win if they would put up politicians who would enforce the constitution - impossible. So we are left with Republicans who are selling us down stream for the interests of business and world politics. Where are you Bush brown nosers???

[kaylar]

Like the European Common Market, NAFTA was billed to an unsuspecting public in 1992 as a free-trade agreement, when in fact it was simply the first step toward the supra-national pan-American political entity that will be called the American Union. Or perhaps, as the current parlance has it, the Union of the Americas. This is why George Bush and the Republican leadership so freely – and otherwise inexplicably – ignore the will of the Republican Party membership, which is strongly in favor of enforcing the immigration laws, if not tightening them. There is no point in attempting to prevent Mexican citizens from entering the United States when citizens of Mexico, the USA and Canada will soon enjoy a shared national identity. This is also why grass-roots efforts to change the status quo of de facto open borders are doomed to failure, as any attempt by state and local politicians to enforce the law in border states will be quickly shut down by federal organizations and the judiciary, and as President Fox helpfully points out, private attempts will be prosecuted in any court likely to find them illegal.

I agree with this, but it appears that the AU/FTAA has stalled, perhaps permanently. Other articles indicate that the nations of south and central America have turned their backs on FTAA, because they are afraid of DC. Instead, they are turning to free trade pacts with each other (mercusor, sp?) and with the EU (both Mexico and Brazil have done this) or with strengthening ties with China (Venezuala).

I believe the traitors in DC thought it was a done deal, the destruction of the Coonstitution and US sovereignty, but both might yet be preserved because of antiamerican sentiment south of the Mexican border. Nafta might morph into an officially open-borders monstrosity, but I think the AU/FTAA is dead.

[seadevil]

Methinks the author of this piece makes a rather invalid comparison between Europe of the past several decades and current America. I wouldn't be so quick to discount the 3 to 5% here (about 9 to 15,000,000 at last count) who wouldn't hesitate to drop the hammer if the nation was seriously threatened. While the book "Term Limits" is only a novel, it could become rather prophetic.

Yes, I know all about the frog/boiling water analogy. But one of things that is so striking about America in the last two centuries, has been our ability to absorb even catastrophic damage before we "see the light", so to speak.

However, once that "Rubicon" is crossed, the world has indeed, and, will again, tremble.

After the lifting of the seige of Bastogne, a wounded German colonel remarked that there is nothing more savage than an American fighting man because he is fighting for a deep seated, national cause; slow to anger, but terrifying to behold.

Those who believe otherwise should study history; lest the events of 1776-1789 repeat themselves.

By the way, this shouldn't be construed as any sort of warning; just friendly advice....for the moment.

[RippleFire]

bump

[sergeantdave]

Anytime you have a so-called "free trade" pact - NAFTA, WTO - that entails tens of thousands of rules managed by thousands of unelected bureaucrats, it's not free trade. At best, it's managed trade. At worse it's a set of contrived rules established by an elite oligarchy to suppress free market competition.

Free trade can be boiled down to a single sentence - the movement of goods and services across borders without hindrance or let.

[the gillman@blacklagoon.com]

It's too late by voting and complaining. It will be all over in 08.

[Dante3]

Not too late yet but time is running out.

[softengine]

Thanks for the post, Marlboro Man. Vox rocks.

What will be interesting, and a litmus test of the much balleyhooed methodology for identifying 'Homeland Security' risks per (everyone's fav trample-the-constitution-tool) The Patriot Act [flame suit on], is whether Vox, ends up arrested as a threat to the Homeland.

I'm willing to bet that its only a matter of time before Vox, and those like him, are rounded up and carted off (sans due process).

[spodefly]

The water has been boiling for a while, and there is no place to jump to. Any talk of fighting back is just shoveling sand against the tide.

Even if patriots decide that ballots no longer work and bullets are now necessary, then what exactly would we be fighting for anyway? The vast majority of this country has been socialized into the Hollywood/gay marriage/multicultural/national healthcare nonsense, and they won't risk their getting their hands dirty fighting for anything anyway.

It is a done deal. The only thing left is our illusion that something can be done to stop it.

[moehoward]

bump

[B4Ranch]

>>and accepted that the dictates of the unelected 17-man European Commission would thenceforth supersede national legislatures.<<

Kind of like the way we have succumbed to the ESA, EPA, etc.

>>the absence of a body count does not mean that the institution respects individual liberties or suffers any limits upon its power.<<

Hmmmmm, the Patriot Acts?

>> This is why George Bush and the Republican leadership so freely – and otherwise inexplicably – ignore the will of the Republican Party membership, which is strongly in favor of enforcing the immigration laws, if not tightening them. There is no point in attempting to prevent Mexican citizens from entering the United States when citizens of Mexico, the USA and Canada will soon enjoy a shared national identity.<<

Sovereignty? Well it's gone, no use discussing it anymore.

>>Since the U.S. Constitution no longer exists as a definitive legal document,<<

We'll get around to changing the Presidential Oath of Office someday, maybe.

>>Voters can't prevent it, since both the present administration and its Democratic opposition support pan-American amalgamation, nor can state or local officials since the concept of a right to secession was settled by military force in 1865.<<

Wanna bet we can't change it?
DO NOT RE-ELECT ANYONE WHO IS IN OFFICE TODAY! Now is the time to start over with Ben and Mary from the local hardware store, Tommy, Fred, Herb and Bill the ex Marines up the street from you. The men whom you see in church each eek with their families. Yup, you and your neighbors. If we get rid of the current bunch of traitors and start over with men and women who understand the meaning of corruption, deceit, honesty and Jesus Christ, we stand a pretty good chance of saving our country!

If we keep the corrupt bunch we have now who are promoting Agenda 21 behind our backs then we can kiss ole Red, White and Blue goodbye because she'll never mean the same to us again.

>>I estimate you've got about 38 more years to do so.<<

The author is an optimist, that's for sure.

Footnote:
The UN has done a fantastic job and they need to be congratulated. At least half of our legislators think we cannot survive without them. The UN is the origin or everything mentioned in the article.
Are you going to lay back and allow them to continue or are you going to call your Rep and demand we get out and get the UN out?

[swampfox98]

There is no point in attempting to prevent Mexican citizens from entering the United States when citizens of Mexico, the USA and Canada will soon enjoy a shared national identity.

I've been saying this is the case for years, but not many people will believe it. In fact, they will still be disbelieving when the Union becomes a fact, and Vincente becomes our coPresident.

[who knows what evil?]

Vox Day...the ONLY reason I visit World Net Daily.

[hosepipe]

Annex Baja California..