Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
I assume the same law is being talked about here:

DO NO HARM. DO LESS HARM. [K. J. Lopez]

During the debate tonight, Democrats in the House have said that the president is inconsistent on Terri Schiavo because when he was governor of Texas he signed a bill that was recently used in a terrible case in Texas to deny lifesaving treatment to a baby against the child’s family’s wishes.

But according to a source familiar with what went down in Texas, the then-governor signed into law something better than what Texas hospitals were already doing. There were not enough votes in the Texas legislature to require life-saving treatment to patients, which is what the governor would have preferred…

Link

Qwinn

23 posted on 03/21/2005 12:47:50 AM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Qwinn; Howlin; Peach
Yes. This is the bill. And don't be surprised if the precedent set tonight doesn't get invoked to require federal judges to look at each and every terminally ill case in the United States. Doctors and hospitals are going to be second-guessed at every turn.

If you think health care's expensive now, wait until hospitals start propping up Aunt Gertie in the corner for fear of being taken to federal court.

30 posted on 03/21/2005 12:53:40 AM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson