Skip to comments.
President Bush Signs Schiavo Bill
3/21/05
Posted on 03/20/2005 10:27:51 PM PST by paltz
As Per Fox News
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; billsigning; bush43; parentsrights; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo; terrislaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 481-484 next last
To: Hank Rearden
In any "ordinary" case, you'd be right and have my full agreement. This is an extraordinary situation and "the Earth had to be moved", so to say, to save this innocent woman.
There are times when principles that apply every day must be set aside for higher principles.
221
posted on
03/20/2005 11:21:53 PM PST
by
Zivasmate
(" A wise man's heart inclines him to his right, but a fool's heart to his left." - Ecclesiastes 10)
To: ClintonBeGone
>>>What he was doing is discounting the logic of the poster to whom he responded. Much like I am doing with this and any subsequent posts you might make on this subject.
Thanks. I'll be sure to give your posts equal regard.
222
posted on
03/20/2005 11:22:01 PM PST
by
Keith in Iowa
(If the detainees in Gitmo were being treated like Terri, the libs would be pissed...)
To: DaveTesla
A lot of courageous men have done so. I thank God and I thank them all. I am especially fond of Tom Delay currently.
223
posted on
03/20/2005 11:22:29 PM PST
by
MarMema
("America may have won the battles, but the Nazis won the war." Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall)
To: DaveTesla
The president has struck a blow against the culture of death.Hence, the hordes of hell do howl.
224
posted on
03/20/2005 11:22:49 PM PST
by
JCEccles
(If Jimmy Carter were a country, he'd be Canada.)
To: WhoNeedsTickets; MadIvan
I doubt anyone was banned simply for disagreeing.
Some have a way of disagreeing distastefully and turning themselves into the troll of the day.
I'm guessing that the first recourse with a long time freeper is suspension before it is banning.
Ivan is spot on, though. Some folks don't realize Schiavo is a case about killing a woman on hearsay evidence. Expand that permission beyond this case, and the implications are chilling.
This must be stopped.
Thanks, MadIvan.
225
posted on
03/20/2005 11:22:49 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: WhoNeedsTickets
The only statement in the U.S.C. that reflects most of the original intention of the mandates is from Cummings v. Missouri (1867). It states, "A bill of attainder, is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without judicial trial and includes any legislative act which takes away the life, liberty or property of a particular named or easily ascertainable person or group of persons because the legislature thinks them guilty of conduct which deserves punishment."
226
posted on
03/20/2005 11:23:12 PM PST
by
KDD
To: WhoNeedsTickets
Or, longstanding members and state's rights supporters who object to federal government intrustion (i.e. CONSERVATIVES) who want to voice their positions without getting banned.
How is it federal intrusion when it grants a permissive right to two people (the parents)? It's up to them if they take advantage of that right. The constitution ALLOWS congress to extend federal jurisdiction to whomever they choose. Read up on it. I'm disappointed you're taking the side of government (state) over people.
227
posted on
03/20/2005 11:23:20 PM PST
by
ClintonBeGone
(In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
To: Borges
how does Michael Schiavo have a "right" to be Terri's guardian? He has abandoned her for another woman for years. Sorry but I don't see where he has a "right"
228
posted on
03/20/2005 11:23:27 PM PST
by
Fudd Fan
(MaryJo Kopechne needed an "exit strategy")
To: Zivasmate
Say what? I'm afraid you've lost me.
229
posted on
03/20/2005 11:23:41 PM PST
by
GloriaJane
("How Many Babies Are Crying In Heaven Tonight" http://music.download.com/gloriajane)
To: mjtobias
Thank you for coming back on the side of life and for Terri.I've always been on the side of life and on Terri's side.
I'm just very misunderstood because I haven't let my emotions carry me away like some here have.
I've tried my best to use logic and reason. In my understanding and explainations of how it is she can be legally killed.
As wrong as that is it was and possible still is a very likely outcome.
I pray that she lives.
230
posted on
03/20/2005 11:24:22 PM PST
by
PFKEY
To: imskylark
"President for Life"
And, as someone remarked in an earlier post, "life for president Clinton."
231
posted on
03/20/2005 11:24:24 PM PST
by
mjtobias
(Michael et al. aren't trying to starve Terri because she's dying, but because she isn't. - supercat)
To: Tax Government
I too am concerned for Terri if Michael or his cohorts have access to Terri in this interim period. Isn't there someone trustworthy (not hospice related) who can watch over Terri to made sure she isn't further harmed?
To: Awestruck
It's frightening how eager some people are for this woman to die.
233
posted on
03/20/2005 11:25:01 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Death to Terri! Death to Israel! Death to the Great Satan!)
To: MarMema
A very profound ditto to you! :o)
234
posted on
03/20/2005 11:25:04 PM PST
by
Lauren BaRecall
(Freepertoo to Terri's Dad: "I told him God rarely telegraphs his punches....")
To: Hank Rearden
Are you suggesting that I personally benefit by government intrusion? If so, how, pray tell?
235
posted on
03/20/2005 11:25:17 PM PST
by
Zivasmate
(" A wise man's heart inclines him to his right, but a fool's heart to his left." - Ecclesiastes 10)
To: Prince Charles
That's a disease. Ed Zachary's Disease, if I remember correctly...;-D
236
posted on
03/20/2005 11:25:28 PM PST
by
Judith Anne
(Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
To: Joe_October
I sort of wish they would maintain this level of detail when it comes to whether a person should live or die.
LOL great point. This should be someone's quote of the day. PJ O'Rourke?
237
posted on
03/20/2005 11:25:33 PM PST
by
ClintonBeGone
(In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
To: Bellflower
I'd guess Merryday in Tampa.
238
posted on
03/20/2005 11:27:01 PM PST
by
KDD
To: Hank Rearden
What I don't support is the eagerness for overwhelming federal intrusion into a state issue, as long as it's for "our" causes. I refuse to make anything and everything a federal issue; the Constitution provides for enumerated powers, and that's all. Do you believe Terri was going to be deprived of life without legitimate due process of law? If so, then Amendment XIV.1 and XIV.5 authorize Congress' action.
239
posted on
03/20/2005 11:27:03 PM PST
by
supercat
("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
To: Lauren BaRecall
I am having a glass of champagne.
240
posted on
03/20/2005 11:27:16 PM PST
by
MarMema
("America may have won the battles, but the Nazis won the war." Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 481-484 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson