I'll wait for the CNN statement acknowledging that their trasncript is wrong.
oh come on... I have your tape ready.
I can put it the mail today.
"I'll wait for the CNN statement acknowledging that their trasncript is wrong."
I imagine that CNN will, in fact, change their transcript.
But even then, my question still hasn't been answered. Did the tone of his voice change when he allegedly 'paraphased them', role-played them, or 'spoke on their behalf'?
If there was no tone change indicating that he was 'role-playing' them, then it still does, in fact, mean he said 'we', and I can only assume he meant what he said. If there was a tone change, such as a higher pitch for example, then he was, in fact 'paraphrasing' them.