| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 03/22/2005 6:58:02 PM PST by Lead Moderator, reason:
Part 4, day 5 thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1368430/posts |
Posted on 03/20/2005 10:27:03 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida
Continuation of Terri Schiavo daily March threads. Due to overwhelming participation we reached over 5000 posts in three days time!
Yes, but their functionality is generally limitted to federal employees.
On the other hand, how about an order that hospices receiving federal funding shall be required to maintain hydration for patients on whose behalf court cases are pending?
Don't sweat it...after this debacle; I wouldn't waste one thin dime on the state of Florida.
You have Freep Mail
It does no good to issue a subpoena if they aren't going to enforce it.
but I guess their Easter break was more important.
Thanks! But I found what curiousmind was looking for.
Just keep praying, CindyDawg....we must trust God to work and move hearts.
Felos went pale. “Terri wants to die,” he said. He said she must die, because this is what she wanted. “We owe it to Terri.” The previously solemn crowd yelled “NO.” Felos consistently referred to Terri as PVS and a “lifeless human.” He characterized the Schindler’s efforts in trying to save their daughter’s life as “ludicrous” and a “waste of the court’s time.” He accused Terri’s parents of “creating confusion” with their desperation tactics. Lastly, Felos played the religion card.
Felos claimed that Father Gerard Murphy, a former St. Petersburg priest who gave inaccurate and muddled testimony regarding euthanasia in Terri’s case several years ago, was the “end-of-life” spokesman for the St. Petersburg diocese. Felos attempted to use the priest’s statement to prove that the Catholic diocese was in favor of euthanasia. He also claimed that former retired Bishop Thomas Larkin, who supported Terri, agreed she should be allowed to die.
The audience was made up largely of Catholics who were familiar both with Bishop Larkin’s support for Terri and Fr. Murphy’s false testimony. They had long deplored the fact that Bishop Robert N. Lynch did nothing to correct Murphy’s testimony or to support the Schindler family in their battle against euthanasia. In response to Felos’ comment on Larkin, they spontaneously shouted, “Not TRUE!” and said “Felos is lying.” The bailiffs appeared ready to escort the people out of the courtroom but didn’t ask anyone to leave. Two women sat silently praying the rosary. Others were praying silently also. David Pritchard, the Webmaster for the Terri Schiavo Foundation (http://www.terrisfight.org) whispered, “Can you feel the evil in here?”
Anderson countered Felos’ statement regarding Fr. Murphy’s testimony saying the priest was not speaking on behalf of the diocese but was expressing his personal views. It is well recognized that the Catholic Church opposes euthanasia. Fr. Murphy has since asked for a leave of absence from active ministry and is no longer working in the St. Petersburg Diocese.
http://tinyurl.com/5f6nm
There is no way that you would know if a "living will" for you or yours would even be properly followed. There will be the inevitable loopholes found by those "over" you. Your living will may be as much of a nightmare as our "living" Constitution has become. You must be an overly optimistic person -- with a nice view of his fellow man, like the late Anne Frank, believeing that people are "basically good."
Michael is SICK AND TWISTED.
I'm posting that post per another's request, supercat.
As most of us longtime Terri Freepers know, the Scientologists have no problem with disposing of people they declare to be useless, but I think MS was just a lucky strike for these monsters .. and they were all too willing to aid and abet the evil.
Thanks. I caught her and the others in time!
Felos told Greta that Terris' parents could have taken Terri to mass anytime they wanted to. She was never prevented from attending mass......can I safely say he's a liar?
They're influential there...very influential. Beyond that, I don't know how it works.
George Felos' repeated use of this particular buzzphrase is no accident. No consciousness means unconsciousness. Unconsciousness is Scientology's word for death!
L. Ron Hubbard said that complete unconsciousness is death:
Complete unconsciousness is death. Half unconsciousness is half death. A quarter unconsciousness is a quarter of death. And as one accumulates the pain attendant upon life and fails to accumulate the pleasures, one gradually loses his race with the gentleman with the scythe. And there ensues, at last, the physical incapacity for seeing, thinking and being, known as death.
(Death of Consciousness)
http://www.doctrinaltraining.com/page04.htm
The DEATH DOCTORS will use LIVING WILLS TO KILL PEOPLE.
DO NOT USE HOSPICE OR be very careful when you consider Living Wills.
I NOW CALL THEM, DEATH WISH WILLS.
OR I CALL ** DEATH, TRICK, DOUBLE TALK, WILLS ** ~!
sorry for caps..
Looks like they are certainly capable of influencing the judiciary.
Because it is disturbing to some. I don't agree with that view, but death is nicer that way for others. When I was a kid back in the early 50's, it was routine to see that stuff on TV that the Nazi's did. They want to hide now.
I had a childhood friend who, best friend since we were in 4th grade, who, after she got caught up in Scientology at the age of ~23, no longer was my friend....she wasn't allowed out of the "org" in LA for quite some time. She got brainwashed. Our other friend, since 4th grade, also noticed the peculiar behavior and, of course, their cessation of contact.
who knows what evil? wrote: They're influential there...very influential. Beyond that, I don't know how it works.
Looks like they are certainly capable of influencing the judiciary."""""
They use blackmail and dirty tricks to get to Judges.
It's hedious and evil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.