Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DRUDGE: White House Studies $4 Gallon 'Nightmare' Scenario
Drudge Report ^ | Sun Mar 20 2005 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 03/20/2005 5:09:02 PM PST by West Coast Conservative

**Exclusive**

President Bush's inner circle has become preoccupied with soaring gas prices and its toll on the economy, a well-placed White House source said over the weekend.

Bush has quitely asked for a review of any and all economic fallout on the nation if gas prices continuing racing up and over the psychological line of $3 a gallon, as they have in recent weeks in some locations, the source explains.

Bush's top economic advisers have conveyed to the president that a "nightmare" scenario of $4 a gallon is extremely unlikely in the short term.

"The seasonal run-up of gas prices has been tough this year, but like every year in the past two decades, we expect we will will see some easing," the source claims from Washington.

Developing...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; economy; gas; gasprices; oil; sundayniteshowpimp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-254 next last
To: tomkat
Heck....at Turkey Hill, you can fill up on regular at $199.9.

Of course, the real solution is to "thank" every Left wing Liberal puke you meet and reinforce that "thanks" with a well placed comment about how they're traitorous and anti-American for allowing the 'common folk' to suffer with artificially high fuel prices via their environmental and twisted political and social agendas.

221 posted on 03/21/2005 6:26:10 PM PST by Thumper1960 ("It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed."-V.I.Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Evolution

Washington D.C. (is) the "WIND Capitol" Of the world!


222 posted on 03/21/2005 6:55:01 PM PST by winker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sagebrush58

Price caps don't do anything but discourage conservation and de-incentivize production. Your solution is to Carterize the economy? LOL.


223 posted on 03/21/2005 6:55:04 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (The South will rise again? Hell, we ever get states' rights firmly back in place, the CSA has risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

Comment #224 Removed by Moderator

To: sagebrush58
"My solution is to discourage price-fixing and gouging. Making a fair profit is all well and good, but it's fairly well known that oil companies are all too willing to take advantage of helpless consumers."

Price fixing falls apart over time. That can be solved by prosecutors with half a brain. Price gouging is a matter of perspective--and you're arguing they are gouging right now! Price caps are government intervention in the market to regulate prices, and who will decide what 'a fair profit' is? You? Legislators? Government bureaucrats? And what is to stop government from deciding that, having established a 'fair profit' margin for petroleum companies, they should not do the same for others?

Price caps are counterproductive for all sorts of reasons, perhaps most notably because if we don't allow prices to rise to the appropriate level, no incentive is there to actually produce some different fuel, develop new sources of the same fuel, or develop a different mode of transport that solves the problem. Price caps are anticapitalism at its best, and if you advocate them for anything, you should be advocating them for everything like a good little socialist.

225 posted on 03/21/2005 7:43:51 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (The South will rise again? Hell, we ever get states' rights firmly back in place, the CSA has risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: tomkat
Strip the friggin' taxes off and we immediately get about 40% relief.

if the gas taxes are percentages of price, then definitely they need to reduce them,,, they can afford deferring some of that windfall back to us... BUT, aren't the taxes a fixed amount per gallon?

226 posted on 03/21/2005 9:15:49 PM PST by CatAtomic ("If Tom Landry isn't in heaven, we're all in trouble." - Roger Staubach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BoilermakerCAengineerguy
Hey, brother, I was only saying that if it costs $100 to fill up your tank, some people (who are able to) would make some changes in their lives. I was not talking about engineers in the aerospace industry. I was talking about anyone who would be able to make those decisions and be able to execute them in the hope of saving money on a luxury item such as fuel. Yes, I said a luxury item. I didn't make that up. The Gov't still treats a home phone line as a luxury item. We are charged an excise tax on our phone lines. Same with gas. Same with a lot of things we use every day.

All I was saying was that if it becomes easier for people to make these changes, they will.

227 posted on 03/21/2005 9:20:06 PM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: jpl

"The dirty little secret here is that there's a lot of left-wingers in America who WANT the price of gasoline to go way up"

And half the Freepers on this thread!

Honestly, I thougt that I was reading a DU thread at first, with all the class hatred of SUV's, and "let-them-eat-cake" attitudes...

Ed


228 posted on 03/22/2005 1:17:44 AM PST by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

"people will begin to work from home, get a job closer to home, carpool, plan travels far in advance, purchase smaller cars, scooters and motorcycle..."

Sounds like a wonderful socialist paradise!

Force everyone to shrink, conserve, give up unecessary driving, turn down the thermostat, stop buying cars to hold your family, stop camping and RV trips, don't live in the country, don't go on long drives for enjoyment and to see the country, man, let's just get Jimmy Carter to run for president again!

In fact, let's tax the hell out of ALL conspicuous consumption, let's tax all hobbies, anything unecessary, force everyone to become grey and small, just like East Germany!

Did someone from the Maryknoll Institute accidently hijack Free Republic on this thread???

Ed


229 posted on 03/22/2005 1:32:04 AM PST by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: BoilermakerCAengineerguy

""People will begin to work from home" -- I'm sure that's a viable option for a small percentage of people in this country, but please explain to me how those who work in retail environments, production environments, teachers, law enforcement officials, etc. could work form home."

Let them eat cake...

At least according to some, seemingly.

Ed


230 posted on 03/22/2005 1:36:23 AM PST by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Our lousy Saudi Allies

231 posted on 03/22/2005 1:40:09 AM PST by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagebrush58; LibertarianInExile
Can the US put price caps on OPEC?

So please socialist talk about putting price caps on oil companies here is ridiculous.

232 posted on 03/22/2005 3:40:51 AM PST by Evolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
The Gov't still treats a home phone line as a luxury item. We are charged an excise tax on our phone lines. Same with gas. Same with a lot of things we use every day. All I was saying was that if it becomes easier for people to make these changes, they will.

Really?

Then if gas is a luxury item why is their a national reserve incase of emergencies?

Why does the government supplement gas bills for welfare bums?

But in that case I agree and the government should stop supporting these people after all gas is a luxury!

233 posted on 03/22/2005 3:46:19 AM PST by Evolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Ed

If Monopoly games went up 400% because the little metal dog supply dwindled, I dare you to tell me you'd be for dropping taxes on the sale of Monopoly games. I double dog dare you. You cannot say that, because you know as well as I that doing so would infringe on the rest of the game market. So it is with gasoline--if we want to allow capitalism to flourish, the rest of the country's transportation and fuel options must be allowed a level playing field. No fair tilting the court to allow gas an advantage (the government subsidized roads and highways are ALREADY doing that).

I'm not against dropping taxes on EVERYTHING, or even gasoline! But timing is important here. If the market raises gas prices or any other prices for that matter, the "solution" should not be dropping the taxes on that item to keep its sales level--that's an indirect subsidy on gas use if other transportation options aren't so subsidized. The solution to energy problems should be market imposed, not government imposed.


234 posted on 03/22/2005 3:51:04 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (The South will rise again? Hell, we ever get states' rights firmly back in place, the CSA has risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

While conserving is nice and useful in reality the Government needs to be reigned in so real market Captialism can exist in our energy policy!


235 posted on 03/22/2005 3:51:36 AM PST by Evolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

Comment #236 Removed by Moderator

Comment #237 Removed by Moderator

To: Evolution

hey i didn't say it was fair. but the fact remains. it is what it is.


238 posted on 03/22/2005 6:56:59 AM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
I'm a little scared we don't have contingency plans in place for this kind of event

We do. It's called corn. Subsidized and expensive to produce, sure, but it's "our own" and at least no one but red-state Americans with traditional values would be holding us "over a barrel". Flame away.

239 posted on 03/22/2005 7:00:29 AM PST by hispanarepublicana (I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez was't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Ed

Show me where I use the word "force" anywhere in a my post. Go ahead. If living closer to my family, having a shorter commute, and riding a motorcycle makes me a socialist then sign me up, Chairman Mao.


240 posted on 03/22/2005 7:01:27 AM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-254 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson