"Did you nkow that he changed careers to help her? Did you know that nurses and doctors testified under OATH that his care was so meticulous (HIS CARE) that she NEVER had a bedsore and that he nagged them constantly for better care for her?
Did you know that he took her to California and various treatment rehab facilities to try EVERYTHING that was recommended?
There is NO treatment that has ever been recommended for her by legitimate doctors that hasn't been done.
And don't mention the MRI. He even had electrodes imlanted in her brain in the hopes of stimulating brain activity and as such, she is now ineligible for an MRI."
have copied your post in its entirety because i have not seen this information. can you source each paragraph for me and many others who might have missed these things.
Also, i would like to know, if during all that time (was this during the first several years, leading up to the settlement, and then the decision to abandon futher rehabilitative efforts) he indicated that she would not wish to continue?
and, we know that he has given up hope for her recovery, but how do we know what she wants?
do we have anything other than his statements? did i miss that too. please link and post.
you tell us that he was a loving husband and care-giver in the beginning of this tragedy, and that is important, but how do we know that he has not become something far different now?
i am not argueing with you, and if it seems that i am, please be assured that i am looking to you for affirmation of the very important points that you have made.
I have to run, but here are the links:
The Wolfson report:
http://www.miami.edu/ethics2/schiavo/wolfson%27s%20report.pdf
You can read more court documents at abstractappeals.co