Skip to comments.
Terri Schiavo's family have been denied all visitation per Terri's sister
Posted on 03/20/2005 12:29:52 PM PST by kcvl
Per Fox News...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cultureofdeath; parentsrights; schiavo; terri; terrischavio; terrischiavo; terrisfight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 1,101-1,110 next last
Comment #641 Removed by Moderator
To: Cboldt
One was taken off life support.
My husband's elderly aunt had a feeding tube removed.
642
posted on
03/20/2005 4:32:53 PM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: pickyourpoison
At the time of Terri's incident he was working at an Italian Restaurant. It was his boss's attorney (don't know why an attorney turned up so early in this situation) that suggested and followed through on Michael being Terri's guardian.
He has also worked as a manager for McDonalds.
643
posted on
03/20/2005 4:33:00 PM PST
by
windchime
(Hillary: "I've always been a preying person")
To: dogbyte12
The family is accusing him now of causing her injuries, they are defaming his character left and right. Yes, they are; all over time. It's unseemly.
644
posted on
03/20/2005 4:33:01 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: AmishDude
Yes it is definitive. At least the USSC seems to think it is.
To: marajade
Whatever. Michael Schiavo's testimony was upheld. You are mispresenting the way the legal system works. Michael's testimony is not at issue in the legal posture of the case before the SCOTUS. Are you a lawyer?
646
posted on
03/20/2005 4:34:08 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: kcvl
In Terri's 1998 hearings, Felos infamously advocated what he called the "spoon test." The test of whether one is a person with a full right to life, he said, is whether he or she can raise a spoon to his lips unaided.I've always advocated the "calculus test". Granted, I envision a much roomier world.
647
posted on
03/20/2005 4:34:25 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(The Clown Prince-in-a-can of Free Republic!)
To: Cboldt
Michael told the court what Terri would have wanted. The Court agreed.
To: AmishDude
Credible is a low threshold and is in no way definitive. If its good enough for the U.S. Supreme Court, it's good enough for me.
To: marajade
The effect of the USSC refusing to hear the case means they upheld the earlier decision which was in Michael Schiavo's favor.What is so hard to understand about that?
And it was all nine of them.
650
posted on
03/20/2005 4:35:16 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Torie
What's your opinion of post #624?
If there's nothing to hide, or hide from, why wouldn't MS release the records and scans to at least the Schindlers?
651
posted on
03/20/2005 4:35:32 PM PST
by
jla
Comment #652 Removed by Moderator
To: Peach
Thanks... Just wondered if there were expenses that as long as there was a settlement,they thought should be covered.
I think if so, that would change the color of that statement.
653
posted on
03/20/2005 4:36:01 PM PST
by
drc43
(Happily posting red herrings till I know better.)
To: windchime
Joint guardianship...at most. That is not the law in Florida; parents don't have a right to that.
654
posted on
03/20/2005 4:36:06 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: dogbyte12
The family is accusing him now of causing her injuries, they are defaming his character left and right.Perhaps, they've got nothing else to go on. Perhaps the reason it wasn't admitted as evidence in a court is possible their own attorney's thought it was ludicrous as well.
655
posted on
03/20/2005 4:36:20 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(You have a //cuckoo// God given right //Yeeeahrgh!!// to be an //Hello?// atheist)
To: Howlin
Thank you. Juries/Judges find in favor with just sworn testimony all the time in cases. What's so difficult to understand?
To: Howlin
It's unseemly.
Kinda like Michael having kids with another woman, and living with this lady as his common law wife, but insisting on staying married with Terri and refusing to let her family take her home and care for her. Now all THAT is unseemly!
To: marajade
Michael told the court what Terri would have wanted. The Court agreed. Again, in the case of Greer's court, agreed. But the question of the veracity, sufficiency, and validity of that testimnony was OUTSIDE of the question posed to SCOTUS.
658
posted on
03/20/2005 4:37:07 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: freedomdefender
Fortunately, the congressional bill would let a federal judge review the whole thing - de novo - as if new, from the ground upThe judge will be looking at the evidence; there won't be a new trial.
659
posted on
03/20/2005 4:37:36 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Look what they had in the Scott Peterson case. One hair in a pair of plyers and the rest sworn testimony.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 1,101-1,110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson