[vaudine]

Saw him on TV last night, saying he should be with his wife, holding her and, instead of taking his time to be interviewed.
Couldn't help wondering which "wife" he was talking about.

Mostly unremarked in this case are the facts surrounding the settlement and his failure to use it as it was meant--for Terri's rehab. Also missing from media reports are the facts that Terri is
an inconvenience for Schiavo, and he would like for it (her) to go away.

The idea that this LEGAL husband has sole rights to put this woman to death is ludicrous, given that he has everything to gain
from her death.

vaudine

[robertpaulsen]

"The idea that this LEGAL husband has sole rights to put this woman to death is ludicrous, given that he has everything to gain from her death."

Isn't that true in every case? Husband or wife?

What should we do instead? Put it to a vote every time some spouse is in a persistent vegetative state? A nationwide USA Today poll?

Sound to me like you don't trust your spouse to do the right thing. May I suggest a living will, giving that authority to someone else, maybe your parents?

[TAdams8591]

I wonder how often Michael visits Terri? Does anyone know for certain?????

I heard almost NEVER!

Yeah, right, the interview was keeping him from his time with Terri and from holding her hand. LOL!!!!