Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Schiavo: 'Come Down President Bush' (Terri's Husband is Getting Frustrated)
Tampa Bay Online ^ | 3.20.05 | William Levesque

Posted on 03/20/2005 7:51:55 AM PST by gopwinsin04

Angered by the lastest political developments in Washington, Michael Schiavo said Saturday that it isn't just the governor who should visit his wife to learn about the case.

'Come down, President Bush,' Schiavo said in a telephone interview. 'Come talk to me. Meet my wife. Talk to my wife and see if you get an answer. Ask her to lift her arm to shake your hand. She wont do it.'

She won't, Shiavo said, because she can't.

He made a similar offer last week to Florida Governor Jeb Bush saying lawmakers interfering in his wife's life know nothing about the case.

So far, Governor Bush has not responded to the offer. President George W, Bush has said he will sign any federal legislation that will keep Terri Schiavo alive.

Michael Schiavo also said that US Congressional House Majority Leader Tom Delay is a 'little slithering snake' pandering for votes.

'To make comments that Terri would want to live, how do they know?' Schiavo said of the members of Congress who want to keep Terri alive.

'Terri died 15 years ago,' referring to the collapse and cardiac arrest that doctors say virtually destroyed her brain. It's time for her to be with the lord like she wanted to be.'

(Excerpt) Read more at sptimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: cultureofdeath; deathcult; deathfetish; devilsdoctors; doctorsofdeath; euthanasia; evil; goebbels; hitler; mengele; murder; nazis; nocerebralcortex; panderingforvotes; propaganda; psychoticmaleneurse; righttolife; saveterri; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo; terrisfight; weloveyouterri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 541-551 next last
To: Petronski
"We have only hearsay by an interested party to tell us about Terri's wishes."

An "interested party"? He's her HUSBAND for cripes sake!

That should be enough. But in this case, there were two others she told, one of them her best friend, who both testified under oath that Terri told them the same thing she told Michael.

Now what? Do you still insist that "We don't know Terri's wishes at all"?

141 posted on 03/20/2005 9:28:08 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

142 posted on 03/20/2005 9:28:32 AM PST by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
'Come talk to me. Meet my wife. Talk to my wife and see if you get an answer. Ask her to lift her arm to shake your hand. She wont do it.'

I'm starting to believe that talk about something fishy around how Terri ended up this way in the first place. I have to wonder why else a husband would want so badly to end his wife's life.

P.S. Being paralyzed isn't the same as being dead, jackass.

143 posted on 03/20/2005 9:28:37 AM PST by Cinnamon Girl (OMGIIHIHOIIC ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varon
Would not the settlement check for her care and rehabilitation from the insurance company been based on medical diagnosis?

You know, this is an excellent point. Why was he awarded money for her rehabilitation IF there was no possibility she could be rehabilitated? What WAS the award based on?

144 posted on 03/20/2005 9:28:53 AM PST by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: avile
"Is is just my perception or has the MSM been whitewashing the story of the husbands girlfriend , children with her, pocketing trhe malpractice money etc?"

Are you suggesting that the MSM would be anything other than thorough, truthful and objective? Perish the thought! < /sarcasm >

145 posted on 03/20/2005 9:29:17 AM PST by sweetliberty ("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

If she signed a legal living will she would have been terminated a while ago.
Just because he is her husband does not mean he has her best intereests at heart. He has been proven to be a SPOS and his credibility is shot.
According to your logic we should send back abused kids and spouses to the perpetrators.


146 posted on 03/20/2005 9:29:45 AM PST by avile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: shezza

ROFL!


147 posted on 03/20/2005 9:30:23 AM PST by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
No, not in every case does the husband become the guardian. In Sunny von Bulow's case, the children were made guardians and the husband was excluded. There have also been cases where husbands have been ordered not to have any contact with their wife.
148 posted on 03/20/2005 9:30:28 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: amystitz

That's not as clear cut as Will says it is. Because, if he has not broken the marriage contract, fidelity and all with his co-habitator and kids, then the contract must have been null and void based on her state of incapacitation. If on the other hand his infidelity did break the contract he can't be considered sole arbiter. They can't have it both ways, IMO.


149 posted on 03/20/2005 9:30:57 AM PST by AlbionGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Oh my God! That is really scary!

Thanks everyone for the photos!!


150 posted on 03/20/2005 9:31:07 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Vision

Any photos of Jodi?


151 posted on 03/20/2005 9:31:19 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
"than as a murderer like Michael Schiavo"

I believe he's carrying out her wishes. That does not make him a murderer in my book.

And if you weren't blinded by your hatred of him, you'd agree.

152 posted on 03/20/2005 9:31:30 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

I'll bet that Michael is plotting to find out how he can still cash in on this tragedy.


153 posted on 03/20/2005 9:31:53 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shield

I heard he ran off the Nancy Grace show. He must have feared her questions.


154 posted on 03/20/2005 9:32:48 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

His promise to take care of her forever. To provide the very best therapy, etc. I would love to hear from the jurors on that case and how they feel now about falling for that fairytale.


155 posted on 03/20/2005 9:33:04 AM PST by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Actually, I understand your point quite well. You, it seems, do not understand mine. If the argument against congressional interference is based on "common law" regarding marriage, it is certainly pertinent that MS has violated the sanctity of his own marriage by taking a common law wife. according to common law, MS is "one" with his current "wife". as such, he canot also continue to be "one" with Terri


156 posted on 03/20/2005 9:33:44 AM PST by amystitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: rintense
"I think his word is worthless as to what his wife wanted"

I see. But if he were a "nice guy", you'd believe him and Terri would, by now, be dead and buried.

Is that what you're saying?

157 posted on 03/20/2005 9:34:03 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Funny, I think I can see just fine. And I don't agree.


158 posted on 03/20/2005 9:34:49 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
My response didn't seem to answer your question? You read my essay and Johansen's article that fast? Or had you already read them?

I'm not Howlin but I did read the entire editorial you cite yesterday. I'm guessing the author had a strong opinion on this issue before he wrote the piece and cherry-picked opinions that agreed with his, as he does leave out some important aspects medically. This isn't to say he's right or wrong, just that anyone taking this editorial as gospel is probably doing themselves a disservice.

159 posted on 03/20/2005 9:35:02 AM PST by Randjuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: avile
When she went into the hospital in the first place, she must have filled a resuscitate or DNR form. Does anyone know the record?

She was unconscious from oxygen deprivation. She couldn't "sign" anything.

160 posted on 03/20/2005 9:36:29 AM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 541-551 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson