To: FairOpinion
"The other bottom line is that regardless of what anyone thinks about Terri's mental condition or ability, her parents are willing to take her and take care of her, so why not allow her to live."Why not, indeed.
1,622 posted on
03/20/2005 12:44:26 AM PST by
Miss Behave
(Man who fart in church sit in own pew.)
To: Miss Behave
By the same token, why don't we just kill all paraplegics, quadriplegics, people who had strokes, get Alzheimer's, or other neurological diseases, not to mention cancer and so on.
Let's just select the one who are "fit" mentally and physically, as defined by some judges, and kill everyone else?
I am being sarcastic, of course, but the extension is not that far, from Terri's case. She left NO living will and she is NOT on life support -- she is merely being given food.
All the above mentioned disable people can't feed themselves, so let's just kill them all. I am sure that is the precedence the "death culture" people are trying to establish, using poor Terri as their unwitting victim.
1,629 posted on
03/20/2005 12:55:12 AM PST by
FairOpinion
(http://www.helpterri.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson